TABLE 1.
Feeding subscale | Items | EFA factor loadings | Cronbach’s α | Test-retest reliability (ICC) |
n | ||||
Responsive | 8 | 0.49–0.77 | 0.79 | 0.79 |
Forceful | 4 | 0.45–0.73 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
Restrictive | 5 | 0.61–0.77 | 0.76 | 0.83 |
Indulgent | 6 | 0.53–0.74 | 0.74 | 0.88 |
Uninvolved | 4 | 0.81–0.87 | 0.87 | 0.57 |
CFA assessed the overall goodness of fit of the 5-factor solution (root mean square error of approximation = 0.047; comparative fit index = 0.90; standardized root mean square residual = 0.062); Cronbach’s α assessed the internal consistency reliability of the feeding subscales; EFA assessed individual factor loadings; ICC assessed the test-retest reliability of the feeding subscales among a subsample (n = 33) of the 297 participants. CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; EFA, exploratory factor analysis; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.