Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007 Jan 21;153(1):10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.01.013. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.01.013

Table 1. Gene targeting data.

Strain Experiment a Tet Survivorship b
(%)
Transformed
clones
GFP
negative
Transformation efficiency (×10−6) c
EctopicGFP− NativeGFP+ Total
1 1 No 5.1 4 2/4 0.39 0.39 0.79
1 2 No 9.3 10 3/10 0.32 0.75 1.07
2 1 No 4.2 10 6/10 1.43 0.95 2.38
2 2 No 8.1 12 8/12 0.99 0.49 1.48

Mean +/−SD [sum] 6.7 +/−2.4 9 +/−3.5 [36] 52% +/−16 [19] 0.78 +/−0.52 0.65 +/−0.25 1.43 +/−0.7

1 1 Yes 6.9 25 12/12 3.63 0.00 3.63
1 2 Yes 8.1 23 10/12 2.37 0.47 2.84
2 1 Yes 6.6 21 7/12 1.85 1.32 3.18
2 2 Yes 5.4 15 8/11 2.02 0.76 2.78

Mean +/−SD [sum] 6.8 +/−1.1 21 +/−4.3 [84] 79% +/−18 [66 d] 2.47 +/−0.80 0.64 +/−0.55 3.11 +/−0.39
a

Each experiment consisted of five rounds of electroporation, each with 10 μg of donor construct (cut with BamHI/XhoI) and 2×107 cells.

b

Proportion of cells that survive electroporation.

c

Transformed clones / cell that survives electroporation.

d

47 out of 84 clones were screened. This is the adjusted figure.