Table 3.
Correct agreement (expressed in percentages) between pre-operative treatment planning and perioperative treatment information when using two-dimensional panoramic imaging vs three-dimensional CBCT. None of these comparisons was significantly different (p > 0.05)
| Parameters | Categories | Panoramic | CBCT |
| Type of treatment | Simple surgical exposure | 0.4 | 0.9 |
| Surgical exposure with attachment | 51.7 | 51.7 | |
| Canine extraction | 13.3 | 8.1 | |
| Technique | Open | 78.2 | 75.2 |
| Closed | 3.0 | 6.8 | |
| Canine crown position in sagittal plane | Buccal | 5.2 | 7.3 |
| Palatal | 42.9 | 46.6 | |
| Close to the line arch | 6.4 | 7.3 | |
| Canine crown position in axial plane | High | 16.7 | 15.0 |
| Medium | 25.2 | 20.9 | |
| Low | 8.6 | 12.0 | |
| Prediction of complication | Complication | 3.9 | 6.4 |
| No complication | 58.1 | 52.6 |
CBCT, cone beam CT.
Values are percentages of the 234 scores (6 observers, 39 cases).