Table 1.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adolescent Report | |||||||||||||
1. Age W1 | -- | ||||||||||||
2. Coresidenceb W1 | −.19** | -- | |||||||||||
3. Nativityc W1 | .06 | .04 | -- | ||||||||||
4. Significant Other Support W1 | .19** | −.04 | −.00 | -- | |||||||||
5. Social Support W1 | −.02 | .10 | .03 | .01 | -- | ||||||||
6. Self-Esteem W1 | .08 | .09 | −.05 | .28*** | .21** | -- | |||||||
7. Expected P-E W1 | −.02 | −.01 | .15* | .18** | .23*** | .31*** | -- | ||||||
8. Perceived P-E W2 | .02 | .06 | .22** | .28*** | .28*** | .36*** | .52*** | -- | |||||
Mother Report | |||||||||||||
9. Family Income W1d | .09 | −.01 | .12 | .07 | .03 | .05 | −.11 | .09 | -- | ||||
10. Educ. Attainment W1 | .15* | .11 | .22** | .03 | .16* | .15* | .09 | .23*** | .34*** | -- | |||
11. Social Support W1 | .00 | .18** | .11 | .00 | .30*** | .10 | .13 | .19** | −.01 | .18** | -- | ||
12. Expected P-E W1 | .23*** | −.04 | .22** | .21** | −.03 | .07 | .22** | .28*** | −.03 | .06 | .20** | -- | |
13. Perceived P-E W2 | .22** | −.04 | .05 | .22** | .05 | .02 | .12 | .25*** | .13 | .08 | .14* | .52*** | -- |
Mean | 16.81 | .87 | .64 | 5.97 | 4.38 | 3.23 | 4.33 | 4.52 | 27313.86 | 8.97 | 4.40 | 3.87 | 4.18 |
Standard Deviation | .99 | .34 | .48 | 1.37 | .75 | .45 | .51 | .41 | 19843.49 | 3.32 | .58 | .72 | .65 |
Note.
Despite missing data for adolescents (4%) and mothers (10%) at Wave 2, the full sample size of N = 205 is provided given the use of full information maximum likelihood methods, which makes use of complete and incomplete observations to inform parameter estimates.
0 = Adolescent and mother do not coreside, 1 = Adolescent and mother coreside.
0 = Mexico born, 1 = U.S. born. W1 = Wave 1, W2 = Wave 2.
Untransformed values for yearly family income were used for ease of interpretation. P-E = Parenting Efficacy.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.