Table 2.

Comparison of mean provider-reported FCC scores among models of primary care, adjusting for patient and provider confounding factors

MODEL OF PRIMARY CARE	LEAST SQUARE MEAN ESTIMATES OF PROVIDER-REPORTED FCC, BY MODEL OF PRIMARY CARE SERVICE DELIVERY, CRUDE AND ADJUSTED ANALYSIS
	UNADJUSTED FCC ESTIMATE (95% CI)	ADJUSTED (PATIENT*) FCC ESTIMATE (95% CI)	ADJUSTED (PATIENT* AND PROVIDER†) FCC ESTIMATE (95% CI)
CHC	0.89 (0.87 to 0.91)‡	0.89 (0.87 to 0.91)§	0.89 (0.86 to 0.91)||
FFS	0.84 (0.82 to 0.87)	0.84 (0.81 to 0.87)	0.84 (0.81 to 0.88)
FHN	0.82 (0.80 to 0.85)	0.82 (0.80 to 0.85)	0.83 (0.80 to 0.85)
HSO	0.83 (0.80 to 0.86)	0.83 (0.80 to 0.87)	0.84 (0.80 to 0.88)

CHC—community health centre, FCC–family-centred care, FFS—fee for service, FHN—family health network, HSO–health service organization.

^*Adjusted for patient sex, annual household income, length of time attending the practice, and the number of family members attending the practice.

^†Adjusted for provider sex and length of routine visit.

^‡Significant pairwise comparisons with Tukey adjustment as follows (mean difference [95% CI]): CHC > FFS, 0.047 (0.015 to 0.079), P = .024; CHC > FHN, 0.066 (0.037 to 0.096), P < .001; CHC > HSO, 0.061 (0.026 to 0.095), P = .004.

^§Significant pairwise comparisons with Tukey adjustment as follows (mean difference [95% CI]): CHC > FHN, 0.069 (0.029 to 0.108), P = .004.

^||Significant pairwise comparisons with Tukey adjustment as follows (mean difference [95% CI]): CHC > FHN, 0.061 (0.017 to 0.105), P = .035.