Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 14;8(11):e79996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079996

Table 4. Putative candidate genes of the DEGs associated with floral induction in tree peonies.

Tree peony gene Arabidopsis ID Unigene ID % identity with homologs RPMK of H1H1-VS-H2FDR RPMK of H2L-VS-H1FDR RPMK of LL-VS-H2FDR
Photoperiod pathway
PsCO NP_568863.1 CL8074.Contig2_All 47 17.3−0.470.027 12.57.558.65E-54 0.097.082.86E-38
PsGI NP_564180.1 CL9113.Contig1_All 75 2.24−0.030.98 2.194.041.32E-14 0.134.03.14E-14
Vernalization pathway
PsFRI NP_850923.1 CL10369.Contig1_All 63 48.3−1.029.45E-29 23.8−0.836.94E-36 85.7−1.851.1E-124
PsVIN3 NP_200548.2 Unigene3778_All 41 12.760.756.16E-07 21.50.730.00017 7.681.481.97E-20
GA pathway
PsGA20OX NP_194272.1 Unigene3745_All 52 7.81−1.170.00067 3.47−0.350.21 9.97−1.521.71E-07
PsGID 1 NP_187163.1 Unigene2987_All 81 243.4−1.840 67.80.252.23E-10 204.7−1.65.26E-211
Floral integrators
PsSOC1 NP_182090.1 Unigene15356_All 61 19.11.42.64E-22 50.6−1.335.68E-20 48.20.0670.63
PsFT NP_176726.1 Unigene5093_All 78 1.212.474.51E-06 6.731.950.15 0.314.423.14E-10

H1-VS-H2:log2 gene expression level in H2 compared to H1.

A FDR (false discovery rate) < 0.001 indicates a significant difference.

Note: percent identity was calculated by comparing the Arabidopsis and tree peony sequences at the amino acid level.