Table 2. Average estimates of Maxent distribution models for small carnivores in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve (2010 and 2011).

Species	Randomtest (%)*	Number of Training samples	Mean Regularized training gain	Mean Unregularized training gain	Mean Training AUC	Number of Test samples	MeanTest gain	MeanTest AUC	Mean AUC Standard Deviation
F. chaus	20	28	0.75	0.92	0.85	7	0.56	0.79	0.068
	30	25	0.75	0.96	0.86	10	0.55	0.80	0.061
	40	21	0.75	0.99	0.86	14	0.50	0.79	0.049
	50	18	0.79	1.04	0.86	17	0.39	0.78	0.048
	Average		0.76	0.98	0.86		0.50	0.79	0.056
V. indica	20	40	0.55	0.70	0.82	9	0.45	0.78	0.059
	30	35	0.60	0.78	0.83	14	0.24	0.73	0.054
	40	30	0.59	0.77	0.83	19	0.31	0.74	0.049
	50	25	0.62	0.84	0.84	24	0.24	0.73	0.043
	Average		0.59	0.77	0.83		0.31	0.75	0.051
P. hermaphroditus	20	18	1.04	1.30	0.89	4	0.77	0.85	0.050
	30	16	1.01	1.31	0.89	6	0.81	0.84	0.053
	40	14	0.91	1.19	0.88	8	0.79	0.85	0.040
	50	11	0.94	1.24	0.89	11	0.56	0.83	0.043
	Average		0.97	1.26	0.89		0.73	0.84	0.046
H. vitticollis	20	42	0.51	0.64	0.80	10	0.26	0.71	0.063
	30	37	0.49	0.64	0.80	15	0.38	0.74	0.053
	40	32	0.49	0.64	0.81	20	0.32	0.72	0.046
	50	26	0.52	0.72	0.83	26	0.24	0.71	0.042
	Average		0.50	0.66	0.81		0.30	0.72	0.051
H. smithii	20	38	0.84	1.03	0.87	9	0.74	0.83	0.062
	30	33	0.85	1.05	0.87	14	0.73	0.83	0.048
	40	29	0.84	1.07	0.88	18	0.70	0.82	0.042
	50	24	0.90	1.16	0.89	23	0.52	0.80	0.042
	Average		0.86	1.08	0.88		0.67	0.82	0.048
H. edwardsii	20	26	1.26	1.53	0.92	6	0.95	0.86	0.058
	30	23	1.24	1.54	0.93	9	0.93	0.87	0.043
	40	20	1.18	1.51	0.93	12	1.07	0.88	0.034
	50	16	1.28	1.63	0.93	16	0.88	0.86	0.036
	Average		1.24	1.55	0.93		0.96	0.87	0.043

The model performance was computed on different test data set.