Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 17;52(12):2260–2267. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket267

Table 4.

Demographic characteristics and outcome measures of general health and disease-specific questionnaires and performance tests in erosive persons (n = 80)

Outcome Erosive, ≥1 E phase (n = 23; 76 affected joints) Erosive, R phase only (n = 57; 140 affected joints) Adjusted mean differencea (95% CI)
AUSCAN pain 8.7 (4.6) 7.7 (4.0) −1.0 (−3.0, 1.0)
AUSCAN stiffness 2.0 (0.9) 1.3 (1.0) −0.7 (−1.2, −0.2)
AUSCAN function 15.5 (7.9) 13.1 (8.1) −2.4 (−6.4, 1.5)
AIMS-2 pain subscale 5.3 (2.8) 4.4 (2.5) −0.8 (−2.1, 0.5)
AIMS-2 hand/finger function 3.9 (2.7) 2.8 (2.2) −1.1 (−2.2, −0.1)
AIMS-2 impact subscale 2.5 (2.3) 2.6 (2.2) 0.1 (−1.0, 1.3)
SF-12 PCS 33.2 (11.1) 38.7 (11.1) 5.8 (0.2, 11.5)
SF-12 MCS 53.1 (9.5) 52.9 (9.3) −0.3 (−5.1, 4.6)
MHQ aesthetics subscale 48.1 (23.7) 54.3 (23.7) 5.4 (−6.6, 17.3)

Values are mean (s.d.) unless stated otherwise, stratified for the presence of erosive (E) or remodelled (R) phase with mean differences of outcome between E phase and R phase persons. E phase: eroded joint according to the Verbruggen–Veys scoring method; R phase: remodelled joint according to the Verbruggen–Veys scoring method.

aAdjusted for age and sex; PCS: physical component summary score; MCS: mental component summary score.