Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 11;52(12):2229–2237. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket291

Table 3.

Analysis for the unilateral–bilateral comparisons for the 20-m walk (m/s)a

Severe Unilateral, severe Bilateral, severe–mild Bilateral, severe–moderate Bilateral, severe–severe Unilateral–bilateral contrast P* Trend P
    Unadjusted 1.25, 0.21, 93 1.24, 0.20, 49 1.20, 0.20, 65 1.17, 0.21, 43
    Adjusted 1.23, 93 1.25, 49 1.21, 64 1.19, 43 0.21 0.47
Moderate Unilateral, moderate Bilateral, moderate–mild Bilateral, moderate–moderate Unilateral–bilateral contrast P* Trend P
    Unadjusted 1.28, 0.20, 138 1.27, 0.23, 73 1.22, 0.21, 75
    Adjusted 1.27, 133 1.27, 71 1.25, 74 0.78 0.47
Mild Unilateral, mild Bilateral, mild–mild Unilateral–bilateral contrast P* Trend P
    Unadjusted 1.36, 0.21, 209 1.32, 0.22, 90
    Adjusted 1.35, 207 1.35, 90 0.98

*All P-values are adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity and BMI.

aAll data are reported in the following order: mean, s.d. and sample size for unadjusted analyses and mean and sample size for the adjusted analyses.