Table 2. Correlations between personality and well-being variables in the Swedish sample.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extraversion (1) | – | ||||||||||||||
Neuroticism (2) | −.35*** | – | |||||||||||||
Agreeableness (3) | .14ns | .17ns | – | ||||||||||||
Conscientiousness (4) | .25** | −.26** | .03ns | – | |||||||||||
Openness (5) | .08ns | .25** | .38*** | −.08ns | – | ||||||||||
Life satisfaction (6) | .52*** | −.49*** | .11ns | .21* | −.09ns | – | |||||||||
Positive affect (7) | .31*** | −.44*** | −.18ns | .27** | −.17ns | .45*** | – | ||||||||
Negative affect (8) | −.23** | .49*** | −.02ns | −.18ns | .21* | −.38*** | −.32*** | – | |||||||
Psychological Well-Being (9) | .53*** | −.63*** | .03ns | .52*** | −.01ns | .67*** | .38*** | −.38*** | – | ||||||
Positive relations (10) | .49*** | −.33*** | .38*** | .13ns | .20ns | .42*** | .05ns | −.19ns | .57*** | – | |||||
Environmental mastery (11) | .44*** | −.65*** | −.11ns | .42*** | −.18ns | .49*** | .51*** | −.51*** | .72*** | .37*** | – | ||||
Self-acceptance (12) | .53*** | −.54*** | .03ns | .27** | −.10ns | .71*** | .38*** | −.29** | .76*** | .46*** | .52*** | – | |||
Autonomy (13) | −.07ns | −.44*** | −.16ns | .19ns | −.04ns | .15ns | .06ns | −.11ns | .36*** | −.03ns | .17ns | .06ns | – | ||
Personal growth (14) | .32*** | −.12ns | .16ns | .35*** | .31*** | .29** | .15ns | −.07ns | .60*** | .18ns | .17ns | .30*** | .17ns | – | |
Purpose in life (15) | .05ns | −.09ns | −.22* | .50*** | −.21* | .17ns | .13ns | −.12ns | .45*** | −.07ns | .21* | .17ns | .02ns | .33*** | – |
Notes.
- ns
- nonsignificant
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.