Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 4;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-12-16

Table 1.

QUADAS results

  Bigelow Compton Adler
1. Was the spectrum of patients representative of the patients who will receive the test in practice?
No
No
No
2. Were selection criteria clearly described?
No
No
No
3. Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition?
No
No
No
4. Is the time period between reference standard and index test short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did not change between the two tests?
Yes
Yes
Yes
5. Did the whole sample or a random selection of the sample, receive verification using a reference standard of diagnosis?
Yes
No
No
6. Did patients receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result?
Yes
No
No
7. Was the reference standard independent of the index test (i.e. the index test did not form part of the reference standard)?
No
No
No
8. Was the execution of the index test described in sufficient detail to permit replication of the test?
No
No
No
9. Was the execution of the reference standard described in sufficient detail to permit its replication?
Yes
No
No
10. Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard?
No
No
No
11. Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test?
Yes
No
No
12. Were the same clinical data available when test results were interpreted as would be available when the test is used in practice?
n/a
n/a
n/a
13. Were uninterpretable/ intermediate test results reported?
No
No
No
14. Were withdrawals from the study explained? No No No