TABLE 3—
Covariate | Model 1, ORa (95% CI) | Model 2, ORa (95% CI) | Model 3, ORa (95% CI) |
Binge drinking in last 30 d | |||
No (Ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Yes | 11.96*** (7.71, 18.58) | 5.75*** (3.28, 10.09) | 3.17** (1.53, 6.54) |
Illegal drug use in the past y | |||
No (Ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Yes | 7.80*** (3.81, 16.00) | 5.91*** (2.64, 13.23) | |
Risky driving | 1.25*** (1.12, 1.39) | ||
Secondary tasks while driving | 1.09 (0.92, 1.29) |
Note. CI = confidence interval; DWI = driving while intoxicated; OR = odds ratio. Model 1 includes binge drinking in last 30 days and covariates; model 2 includes model 1 variable plus illegal drug use in the past year and covariates; model 3 includes model 2 variables plus risky driving and secondary tasks while driving and covariates. Risky driving and secondary task engagement are continuous variables. The total sample size was n = 880 (those who had an independent driver’s license, not a learner’s permit). Goodness-of-fit statistics were as follows: for model 1, χ2 = 283373.68, df = 6; for model 2, χ2 = 400079.35, df = 7, Δχ2 = 116705.67 (P < .001), Δdf = 1, compared with model 1; for model 3, χ2 = 543920.79, df = 9, Δχ2 = 143841.44 (P < .001), Δdf = 2, compared to model 2.
Controlling for race/ethnicity, gender, and driving days in the past 30 days.
**P < .01; ***P < .001.