Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 23;2(4):e000110. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000110

Table 3.

Adjusted Relationship Between Specialty of Care Provider and Treatment Strategies

Care Process Provider Specialty Adjusted OR Lower (95% CI for OR) Upper (95% CI for OR) P Value Global P Value
Rhythm control EP (vs cardiology) 1.66 1.05 2.61 0.0301 0.0470
FP/IM (vs cardiology) 0.91 0.65 1.26 0.5512
Prior cardioversion EP (vs cardiology) 1.39 1.03 1.87 0.0292 0.0231
FP/IM (vs cardiology) 0.88 0.70 1.10 0.2699
Oral anticoagulant (warfarin or dabigatran) EP (vs cardiology) 1.25 0.71 2.19 0.4350 0.1500
FP/IM (vs cardiology) 0.73 0.49 1.09 0.1233
Dabigatran vs warfarin EP (vs cardiology) 1.11 0.49 2.50 0.8023 0.2395
FP/IM (vs cardiology) 0.61 0.32 1.13 0.1179
Antiplatelet* EP (vs cardiology) 1.34 0.93 1.92 0.1132 <0.0001
FP/IM (vs cardiology) 0.60 0.47 0.79 0.0002
Anticoagulant clinic* EP (vs cardiology) 3.51 0.90 13.67 0.0705 0.0577
FP/IM (vs cardiology) 0.60 0.23 1.60 0.3097

OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; EP, electrophysiology; FP, family practice; IM, internal medicine.

*

Aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel.

*

Analyses only among those on warfarin (n=7176).