TABLE 2—

Organization of References Into Conceptual Model Themes in a Systematic Literature Review on Shared Decision-Making in Cancer Treatment Among Minority Populations

Theme and Subthemes	Quantitative References	Qualitative References
Treatment decision-making process
Decisional role	26–28,30–34	36,38–47
Conflict between actual and preferred decisional role	28,31	39,41,43,45,46
Satisfaction or regret with decision-making or decision	28,31,48	39,41,43–46
Patient factors
Level of acculturation and language	26–29,33,48	36,37,41,42,44
Spirituality and fatalism	34	36,40,43–45,47
Attitudes about treatment and decision	27,29,34	36,38,43,45
Self-efficacy	32,33	44
Factors of family and important others
Participation or advocacy of others in decision-making	26–29,33,35
Participation or advocacy of others and receipt of treatment	26–29,33,35
Consequences of ceding decision-making autonomy		37–39,41,42,44,45,47
Vicarious experiences	35	40,43,45
Community factors
Cultural or community norms and values		36–38,40,41,45
Communication with the community		36,37,42,45
Decision-making as a collective experience		37,39,45
Provider factors
Provider preferences and recommendations	27,29,30,35	36,39,41,43,47
Provider communication and information giving	30,32,35	36,39,41–46
Conflict and cultural congruence in the patient–provider relationship		41,42,44