Table 4.
Servings of Fruit and Vegetables Combined (n=13,281) | Servings of Fruit (n=13,310) | Servings of Vegetables (n=13,296) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
Coeff | P-value | Coeff | P-value | Coeff | P-value | |
Neighborhood SES | 0.24 | <0.0001 | 0.13 | <0.0001 | 0.11 | 0.0006 |
| ||||||
Race/Ethnicity | ||||||
Mexican American | 0.11 | 0.4986 | 0.21 | 0.0578 | -0.12 | 0.2951 |
NH Black | -0.24 | 0.0509 | 0.16 | 0.0245 | -0.41 | <0.0001 |
‘Other’ | -0.24 | 0.2870 | -0.19 | 0.2398 | -0.04 | 0.7659 |
NH White (ref) | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ||||||
Age (centered) | 0.02 | <0.0001 | 0.02 | <0.0001 | 0.01 | 0.0146 |
Age (centered) squared | -0.0001 | 0.3277 | 0.0001 | 0.1146 | -0.0003 | 0.0081 |
| ||||||
Female | -0.71 | <0.0001 | -0.09 | 0.0945 | -0.62 | <0.0001 |
| ||||||
US-born | -0.83 | <0.0001 | -0.62 | <0.0001 | -0.21 | 0.0757 |
| ||||||
Educational Attainment | ||||||
Grade School | -1.14 | <0.0001 | -0.66 | <0.0001 | -0.48 | 0.0002 |
Some High School | -0.77 | <0.0001 | -0.53 | <0.0001 | -0.25 | 0.0423 |
High School | -0.46 | <0.0001 | -0.39 | <0.0001 | -0.07 | 0.4194 |
Post High School (ref) | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ||||||
Family Income | ||||||
Poor | -0.52 | 0.0074 | -0.21 | 0.1103 | -0.30 | 0.0228 |
Low income | -0.34 | 0.0468 | -0.14 | 0.1432 | -0.20 | 0.1201 |
Middle income | -0.27 | 0.0341 | -0.07 | 0.4318 | -0.20 | 0.0314 |
High income (ref) | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ||||||
Employment status | ||||||
Employed | 0.23 | 0.2277 | 0.06 | 0.5065 | 0.17 | 0.2907 |
Not in Labor Force | 0.27 | 0.1346 | 0.09 | 0.2414 | 0.19 | 0.2600 |
Unemployed (ref) | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ||||||
Region | ||||||
Northeast | 0.14 | 0.4948 | 0.07 | 0.5734 | 0.07 | 0.6037 |
Midwest | 0.02 | 0.9021 | 0.04 | 0.7179 | -0.01 | 0.9477 |
South | -0.27 | 0.1327 | -0.26 | 0.0103 | -0.01 | 0.9448 |
West (ref) | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ||||||
Intercept | 6.37 | <0.0001 | 2.39 | <0.0001 | 3.97 | <0.0001 |
| ||||||
Random Effects | ||||||
Level 1 variance | 9.62 | <0.0001 | 3.32 | <0.0001 | 5.58 | <0.0001 |
Level 2 variance | 1.97 | <0.0001 | 0.55 | <0.0001 | 1.09 | <0.0001 |
Level 3 variance | 0.07 | 0.0490 | 0.04 | 0.0053 | 0.03 | 0.0717 |
| ||||||
ICC-level 2 (%) 2 | 16.90 | 13.95 | 16.23 | |||
ICC-level 3 (%) 2 | 0.58 | 1.14 | 0.44 | |||
| ||||||
Fit Statistics | ||||||
-2 Res LL | 77876.0 | 63752.7 | 70682.3 | |||
AIC | 77882.0 | 63758.7 | 70688.3 |
Hierarchical linear models (HLM), or multi-level regressions, were conducted with PROC MIXED using SAS version 9.1. Level 1=individual level, level 2= tract level within counties, and level 3=county level.
ICCs = intra-class correlation coefficients, which provide an estimate of the proportion of total variance in dietary outcome that occurs between geographic areas. Level 2 ICCs provide an estimate of the proportion of variance in dietary outcome that occurs between tracts within counties while level 3 ICCs provide an estimate of the proportion of variance in dietary outcome that occurs between counties.