Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Sep 5;35(2):10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.028. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.028

Table 3. Adjusted associationsa of biology with cognition scores.

Episodic Memory Score
(N=1,072)
Executive Function Score
(N=1,076)
Allostatic load score (range 0-7, SD 1.14) − 0.065** (−.113, −.017) − 0.055* (−.100, −.010)

System-level scores (range 0-1)

 Cardiovascular system score (SD 0.34) − 0.25** (−.41, −.10) − 0.17* (−.32, −.02)
 Glucose metabolism score (SD 0.35) − 0.13 (−.28, +.02) − 0.20** (−.34, −.06)
 Lipid metabolism score (SD 0.26) − 0.11 (−.30, +.08) − 0.19 (−.39, +.00)
 Inflammation score (SD 0.26) − 0.20* (−.39, −.01) − 0.07 (−.24, +.11)
 HPA axis score (SD 0.31) + 0.05 (−.12, +.21) + 0.02 (−.13, +.17)
 Sympathetic system score (SD 0.35) − 0.05 (−.20, +.10) + 0.01 (−.12, +.14)
 Parasympathetic system score (SD 0.36) − 0.07 (−.21, +.07) − 0.07 (−.21, +.06)

Abbreviation: SD = Standard deviation; HPA = Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal

a

Results from separate models for allostatic load and each system score as primary predictor, adjusted for age (continuous, linear plus quadratic), sex, race (White vs. non-White), education (high school or less vs. some college vs. 4-year college graduate or more), parental education (continuous and high school or less vs. some college vs. 4-year college graduate or more), primary language (English vs. not), and neurological conditions (yes/no), and interactions for education with race, gender and age. Associations presented as point estimates (95% confidence limits). Confidence limits based on robust estimates of standard error that account for clustering within families.

p < 0.1;

*

p < 0.05;

**

p< 0.01

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure