Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a0036c. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a0036c

A suggested checklist and assessment guideline for clinicians that the panelists felt could be useful in evaluating patients with suspected device malfunction. Reprinted from “Cochlear Implant Soft Failures Consensus Development Conference Statement,” by T. Balkany et al., 2005, Otology & Neurotology. 26, p. 817. Copyright 2005 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Reprinted with permission.

Suggested Checklist for Assessment of Soft Failures

ADULT/OLDER CHILDREN YOUNG CHILDREN
AUDITORY MAPPING BEHAVIORAL
□ atypical tinnitus □ Changes in levels over time □ Increase in "bad" behaviors
□ Buzzing □ Changes in pulse wdth/dur □ Aggressiveness
□ Roaring □ Loss of Channels □ Unwilling to wear device
□ Engine-like □ Changes in impedance □ Head hitting
□ Static □ Shorts/open circuits □ Inattentiveness
□ Popping □ Regression in language/speech
□ Other
TEACHER/THERAPIST CONCERNS
NONAUDITORY HARDWARE □ Intermittent Responsiveness
□ Pain over implant site □ Replacement of all externals □ Frequent appearance of being "off-task"
□ Pain down neck □ Deterioration in grades/school performance
□ Shocking □ Plateau in performance
□ Burning □ Fails to meet appropriate expectations
□ Itching
□ Facial stim
OTHER FACTORS
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT □ Educational placement
□ Sudden drop □ Surface potential testing □ Type and amount of therapy
□ Decrement over time □ Neural response measures □ Family involvement
□ Fails to meet expected performance □ Stimulus artifact □ Puberty
□ Evoked potentials In addition, the adult checklist should be applied to a child whenever possible.
□ Intermittent performance