Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2013 Sep 10;52(19):10.1021/ic401644g. doi: 10.1021/ic401644g

Table 1.

Comparison of Calculated, Energy-Minimized DFT Structures for [Fe(OEP)(2-MeHIm)].

Method(Ref.) Fe–Npa avea,b Fe–NIma ΔN4a,c NIm–Fe–Npd,e Ref.
crystal structure 2.072 2.074 2.076 2.087 2.077(7) 2.135(3)/2.182f 0.34 19.5 39
BP86/TZVP/6-31G*(72) 2.084 2.086 2.092 2.095 2.089(5) 2.180 0.32 23.6 tw
BP86/TZVP/6-31+G*(72) 2.085 2.086 2.097 2.094 2.090(6) 2.178 0.31 24.5 tw
B3LYP/TZVP/6-31G*(78) 2.101 2.104 2.117 2.118 2.110(9) 2.206 0.39 34.8 75
M06/TZVP/6-31G*(79) 2.096 2.099 2.097 2.095 2.097(2) 2.148 0.40 23 tw
M06L/TZVP/6-31G*(80) 2.075 2.077 2.076 2.076 2.076(1) 2.194 0.29 31.1 tw
a

Distances in Å.

b

Averaged value for the four Fe–Np distances.

c

Displacement of iron from the plane of the four nitrogen atoms

d

Value in degrees.

e

Dihedral angle between NIm–Fe–Np plane and the imidazole plane.

f

Two positions of imidazole.