Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 14;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-74

Table 2.

Proportion of simulations that had the number of components underestimated, overestimated or correctly estimated by NLSA and SA

Simulated scenario NLSA performance
SA performance
SNR = 60
SNR = 120
SNR = 60
SNR = 120
UE (%) OE (%) CE (%) UE (%) OE (%) CE (%) UE (%) OE (%) CE (%) UE (%) OE (%) CE (%)
Tri-exponential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  No trapping (α0 = 0)
85
-
15
0
-
100
-
81a
19a
-
100a
0a
  Trapping 1 (α0 = 0.006)
100
-
0
46
-
54
18
-
82
-
-
100
  Trapping 2 (α0 = 0.06)
100
-
0
60
-
40
18
-
82
-
-
100
  Trapping 3 (α0 = 0.2)
100
-
0
95
-
5
46
-
54
-
-
100
  Trapping 4 (α0 = 0.6)
100
-
0
100
-
0
53
-
47
1
-
99
Bi-exponential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  No trapping (α0 = 0)
-
-
100
-
-
100
-
86a
14a
-
-
100a
  Trapping 1 (α0 = 0.006)
1
-
99
-
-
100
17
18
65
-
-
100
  Trapping 2 (α0 = 0.06)
1
-
99
-
-
100
-
-
100
-
-
100
  Trapping 3 (α0 = 0.2)
11
-
89
5
-
95
-
-
100
-
-
100
  Trapping 4 (α0 = 0.6) 34 - 66 32 - 68 - - 100 - - 100

α0 indicates the tracer trapping. Units are in min-1; UE, underestimated number of components; OE, overestimated number of components; CE, correctly estimated. Results are shown only for the percentage of datasets where the presence of baseline was correctly estimated (Table 1). aAn accuracy in baseline identification was <25%.