Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2010 Apr 14;38(7):10.1177/0363546510361494. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361494

TABLE 2.

Kinematic Responses of the Tibia Under the Simulated Quadriceps Muscle Load in 4 Conditionsa

Flexion Angle Intact ACL Deficient ACL SB ACLR DB ACLR
Medial (+) / lateral (−) mm 0° 0.1 ± 0.6 0.9 ± 1.3b 0.5 ± 1.3 −0.1 ± 0.9c,d
15° 0.6 ± 0.9 1.4 ± 2.7 0.9 ± 1.9 0.2 ± 1.2c
30° 0.6 ± 1.3 0.9 ± 3.5 0.8 ± 2.5 0.2 ± 1.7
60° 0.3 ± 1.3 0.2 ± 2.0 0.4 ± 1.7 0.3 ± 1.2
90° 0.1 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.8 0.1 ± 0.8 0.03 ± 0.5
Valgus (+) / varus (−) ° 0° 0.4 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 1.0 0.6 ± 0.9 0.1 ± 0.9d
15° 1.3 ± 0.8 2.0 ± 1.8b 1.9 ± 1.4b 1.2 ± 1.1c,d
30° 1.7 ± 1.1 2.2 ± 1.8 2.4 ± 1.8 1.7 ± 1.4d
60° 1.2 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 1.3 1.5 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 0.9
90° 0.8 ± 0.6 1.1 ± 1.4 1.0 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 1.0
a

ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; SB, single bundle; DB, double bundle; ACLR, ACL reconstruction.

b

Statistically significant difference compared with intact anterior cruciate ligament condition (P<.05).

c

Statistically significant difference compared with anterior cruciate ligament-deficient condition (P<.05).

d

Statistically significant difference compared with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction condition (P<.05).