Table 3.
The GOLD (CHEM-PLP) and HINT scores for the best binding poses in the three opioid receptors.
Compounds | Docking posea |
MOR | KOR | DOR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEM-PLP | HINTb | CHEM-PLP | HINTb | CHEM-PLP | HINTb | ||
NTX | 79 | 1140 | 69 | 1009 | 85 | 1035 | |
NAP | Site 1 | 85 | 1535 | 46 | 769 | 89 | 1263 |
Site 2 | 88 | 1022 | 78 | 489 | 93 | 1034 | |
NAQ | Site 1 | 80 | 1345 | 50 | −344 | 75 | 465 |
Site 2 | 82 | 1125 | 56 | 616 | 73 | −10 |
Clustering of docking poses revealed two unique binding modes. See text for more information.
HINT score differences have generally been shown to relate to ΔΔG such that 515 score units ≈ −1 kcal/mol.