Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Vis. 2011 Jan 3;11(1):10.1167/11.1.2. doi: 10.1167/11.1.2

Table 1.

Results of a detailed analysis of saccades performed during the adaptation phases of the experiment. Differences between the amplitudes of “all saccades” and saccades that were used in the calculation of saccadic gain are due to the contribution of corrective saccades to the “all saccades” measures.

Condition All 6-item 12-item
All saccades horizontal reduction 4.9 ± 0.9° 5.4 ± 0.9° 4.4 ± 0.8°
All saccades vertical reduction 5.3 ± 0.7° 5.7 ± 0.7° 4.7 ± 0.6°
All saccades horizontal augmentation 6.3 ± 1.1° 6.8 ± 1.1° 5.6 ± 1.1°
All saccades vertical augmentation 5.6 ± 0.4° 6.0 ± 0.4° 3.7 ± 2.3°
Adaptation saccades horizontal reduction 7.2 ± 0.4° 8.9 ± 0.6° 6.5 ± 0.3°
Adaptation saccades vertical reduction 6.8 ± 0.4° 8.3 ± 0.4° 6.0 ± 0.4°
Adaptation saccades horizontal augmentation 7.9 ± 0.4° 10.3 ± 0.4° 7.5 ± 0.3°
Adaptation saccades vertical augmentation 8.0 ± 0.8° 9.5 ± 0.4° 7.0 ± 0.3°
Saccadic gain horizontal reduction 0.85 ± 0.06 0.85 ± 0.06 0.83 ± 0.06
Saccadic gain vertical reduction 0.77 ± 0.05 0.77 ± 0.06 0.75 ± 0.04
Saccadic gain horizontal augmentation 1.20 ± 0.04 1.23 ± 0.08 1.16 ± 0.07
Saccadic gain vertical augmentation 1.16 ± 0.06 1.17 ± 0.06 1.11 ± 0.03