Table 3.
Cluster1 | Cluster2 | Cluster3 | Cluster4 | Cluster5 | Cluster6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
Indicators used in the analysis | ||||||
Metropolitan location | ||||||
Central city | 49.1 | 13.5 | 42.3 | 23.8 | 2.6 | 40.2 |
Suburb | 40.5 | 71.5 | 30.2 | 58.1 | 47.3 | 31.5 |
Non-metropolitan | 10.4 | 15.1 | 27.5 | 18.1 | 50.1 | 28.3 |
Race/ethnic composition | ||||||
Non-Hispanic white % | 30.2 | 87.0 | 37.8 | 74.8 | 97.0 | 40.4 |
Black % | 26.7 | 4.5 | 51.9 | 7.2 | 0.9 | 21.4 |
Hispanic % | 39.1 | 4.1 | 8.7 | 7.1 | 0.9 | 24.0 |
Asian % | 3.5 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 8.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 |
Native American % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 12.3 |
Poverty % (free/reduced price lunch) | 59.9 | 20.9 | 68.9 | 31.4 | 34.5 | 66.2 |
Cluster share of schools | 0.187 | 0.187 | 0.186 | 0.170 | 0.167 | 0.104 |
Mean reading score percentile | 40.0 | 68.6 | 34.5 | 61.6 | 58.4 | 37.6 |
Mean math score percentile | 41.6 | 67.5 | 35.0 | 61.5 | 57.7 | 38.9 |
- Predominantly Hispanic, poor and central city
- White, affluent and suburban
- Black and Hispanic, very poor, mixed location
- Majority white, significant Asian presence, affluent and suburban
- Exclusively white low-poverty, mixed suburban and non-metropolitan
- Racially mixed, high Native American presence, high poverty, mixed location