Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 18;8(11):e80952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080952

Table 2. Statistics of two-group Region of Interest analysis: HV vs All_ALC.

Region of Interest   Whole Model a F ratio,       Prob > F Student’s t
  
% Difference in FA
Group   Level b    Least Square   Mean (SE c) of   FA HV > All_ALC
Anterior Commissure 4.21, 0.0053 HV A 0.39 (0.020) 20.5
All_ALC B 0.31 (0.014)
Fornix 6.33, 0.0004 HV A 0.74 (0.019) 14.9
All_ALC B 0.63 (0.013)
Genu 4.02, 0.0070 HV A 0.84 (0.012) 3.6
All_ALC A 0.81 (0.008)
Splenium+ 5.57, 0.0009 HV A 0.86 (0.013) 1.2
All_ALC A 0.85 (0.010)
Right IFO 12.49, <0.0001 HV A 0.62 (0.011) 9.7
All_ALC B 0.56 (0.008)
Right dorsal cingulum bundle 0.39, 0.82 HV A 0.53 (0.019) 3.8
All_ALC A 0.51 (0.013)
Left dorsal cingulum bundle 2.06, 0.10 HV A 0.61 (0.017) 4.9
All_ALC A 0.58 (0.012)

a The whole model is corrected for group, sex, age, and group by sex. b Groups not sharing the same letter are significantly different. c Standard error. + The observed significance of the whole model GLM in the splenium was the result of an effect of age, not group, on FA.