Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 18;8(11):e79049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079049

Table 2. Re-configuration decentralized model: results simulation experiments.

tPA rate (95% CI) OTT min (95% CI) tPA 0–1.5 hr (95% CI) tPA 1.5–3.0 hr (95% CI) tPA 3.0–4.5 hr (95% CI) mRS 0–1
Scenario
0. Current practice 14.4% (13.7% –15.1%) 134 (63–235) 14.3% (12.6% –16.3%) 70.5% (68.1% –72.8%) 15.2% (13.4% –17.1%) 14.7%
Pre-hospital phase
1. Symptom onset to call for help 16.1% (15.4% –16.8%) 128 (50–238) 21.0% (19.0% –23.0%) 64.7% (62.3% –67.0%) 14.4% (12.7% –16.2%) 17.5%
2. First responder 15.3% (14.6% –16.0%) 130 (63–235) 15.5% (13.8% –17.4%) 71.8% (69.5% –74.0%) 12.7% (11.1% –14.5%) 15.9%
3. EMS transport 17.2% (16.4% –17.9%) 134 (67–235) 13.2% (11.7% –14.9%) 73.0% (70.9% –75.1%) 13.8% (12.2% –15.5%) 17.5%
4. High priority transport by EMS 14.6% (13.9% –15.3%) 133 (64–240) 14.8% (13.1% –16.7%) 70.1% (67.7% –72.4%) 15.1% (13.4% –17.1%) 15.0%
5. Combining all pre-hospital scenarios 20.8% (20.0% –21.6%) 127 (44–241) 20.8% (19.1% –22.6%) 66.2% (64.2% –68.2%) 13.0% (11.6% –14.5%) 22.7%
In-hospital phase
6. Neurological examination 14.9% (14.2% –15.6%) 130 (63–235) 17.1% (15.3% –19.1%) 69.9% (67.6% –72.2%) 13.0% (11.4% –14.8%) 15.7%
7. Neuroimaging examination 15.2% (14.5% –15.9%) 127 (56–232) 20.0% (18.1% –22.1%) 66.9% (64.5% –69.2%) 13.1% (11.5% –14.9%) 16.4%
8. Combing both in-hospital scenarios 15.4% (14.8% –16.2%) 124 (55–230) 22.8% (20.8% –25.0%) 65.5% (63.1% –67.9%) 11.7% (10.2% –13.4%) 17.2%
9. Combining all scenarios 22.3% (21.5% –23.1%) 117 (32–236) 28.4% (26.8% –30.3%) 61.2% (59.2% –63.2%) 10.4% (9.3% –11.8%) 26.1%

tPA indicates tissue plasminogen activator; CI, confidence interval; OTT, onset-treatment-time; mRS, modified rankin scale; EMS, emergency medical services.

‡Indicates the proportion of patients with good outcome (mRS 0–1) ascribed to treatment with thrombolysis. The number needed to treat to achieve one patient with mRS 0–1 at 90 days for OTT 0–90 = 4.5, OTT 91–180 = 9.0, OTT 181–270 = 14.1 [21].