Table 3.
Dependent variable: current CES-D score
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
Co-eff | s.e. | P-value | |
Previous network centrality | – 8.285 | 4.142 | 0.045 |
Previous number of friends | –0.278 | 0.094 | 0.003 |
Previous number of family | 0.456 | 0.019 | 0.000 |
Previous CES-D score | 0.036 | 0.028 | 0.195 |
Age | 0.022 | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Years of education | –0.168 | 0.037 | 0.000 |
Female | 1.110 | 0.159 | 0.000 |
Exam 7 | 1.161 | 0.169 | 0.000 |
Constant | –4.469 | 1.454 | 0.002 |
Deviance | 244061 | ||
Null deviance | 327588 | ||
N | 6113 |
Abbreviation: CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale.
Model of ego's CES-D score at current exam regressed on measures from the previous exam including ego's network centrality, number of friends, number of family, plus other covariates. The model was estimated using a general estimating equation (GEE) with clustering on the ego and an independent working covariance structure. Models with an exchangeable correlation structure yielded poorer fit. Fit statistics show sum of squared deviance between predicted and observed values for the model and a null model with no covariates. The main results (coefficients in bold) show that network centrality is associated with a decrease in future depressive symptoms, even controlling for the number of friends and family. This suggests that connection to more socially distant alters (for example, friends of friends) also influences depression.