Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2013 Sep 25;78(19):10.1021/jo4015936. doi: 10.1021/jo4015936

Table 5.

Efficiency of hairpin invasion of various Invaders at 100-fold probe excess.a

ON Invader % recognition
W2 5′-GTG AWA TGC 48 ± 11
W5 3′-CAC TAW ACG

X2 5′-GTG AXA TGC 41 ± 12
X5 3′-CAC TAX ACG

Y2 5′-GTG AYA TGC 38 ± 2
Y5 3′-CAC TAY ACG

Q2 5′-GTG AQA TGC 45 ± 14
Q5 3′-CAC TAQ ACG

S2 5′-GTG ASA TGC <5
S5 3′-CAC TAS ACG

V2 5′-GTG AVA TGC <5
V5 3′-CAC TAV ACG

P2 5′-GTG APA TGC 47 ± 3
P5 3′-CAC TAP ACG

K6 5′-GTG KTA TGC 17 ± 3
K8 3′-CAC TKT ACG

M6 5′-GTG MTA TGC <5
M8 3′-CAC TMT ACG

R6 5′-GTG RTA TGC 41 ± 4
R8 3′-CAC TRT ACG
a

Average of three independent measurements; “±” denotes standard deviation. For experimental conditions see Figure 6.