Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 10;14:693. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-693

Table 3.

B . burgdorferi chromosomal groups

Typing Method a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Strain
B31
1
1
1
1
1
1
1/2
A
64b
3b
1
1
1
1
1
1/2
A
Bol26
1

3
1
1
1
1/2
A
ZS7
1
1
3
1
1
1
1/2
A
156a
2
2
2
2
2
2a
2/1
D
297
2
2

2
2
2b

Dc
JD1
5
1
6
3
2
2c
2/1
D
72a
4
2
4
3
3
3a
1/1
C
94a
8b
3
4
3
3
3a
1/1
C
118a
5
2
4
3
3
3b
1/1
C
CA-11.2A
5
2
2
3
3
3a
1/–
C
N40
9
3
5
3
4
4
2/2
B
WI91-23
7
2
4
3
5
4
2/1
B
29805 6 3 7 3 6 4 1/1 B

a. Chromosomal typing methods are as follows:

1. Ribosomal rRNA spacer IGS1 [35,37].

2. Arbitrary MLST group name [33,38].

3. Arbitrary MLST group name (Figure 1 this report).

4. RST type deduced from our sequences [67,68].

5. Plasmid content similarity, arbitrary group name (S. Casjens, unpublished).

6. Chromosomal right end organization, arbitrary group name (S. Casjens, unpublished).

7. Two chromosomal indels: 157 bp in gene 0021 and 27–30 bp between genes 0001 and 0002 (1 = no deletion; 2= deletion).

8. Chromosomal, cp26 and lp54 SNP type, this report.

- not determined.

b. IGS1 lineages 1 and 3 form a coherent superlineage, and IGS1 8 is a rather close relative of lineage IGS1 5 [35].

c. 297 chromosomal SNP type not determined.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure