Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 28;111(6):520–529. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.76

Table 1. Interspecies F2 crosses between C. rhenanus and C. perifretum were used for map construction and to identify the genetic basis of sex.

Cross type Mapping family Total Map construction Sex mapping Males Females Sex ratio Balanced sex ratio(P-value)
Broel(♂) × WN(♀) ZG11 104 104 NA NA NA NA NA
  ZG18 76 76 NA NA NA NA NA
  ZG33 52 NA 52 24 28 0.462 0.579
  ZG42 97 NA 97 51 46 0.526 0.612
WN(♂) × Broel(♀) ZG40 86 58 28 18 10 0.643 0.131
  ZG46 75 55 20 15 5 0.750 0.025
LB(♂) × Naaf(♀) ZG26 117 96 21 10 11 0.476 0.827
  ZG32 115 98 17 10 7 0.588 0.467
  ZG35 38 NA 38 21 17 0.553 0.516
  ZG38 70 70 NA NA NA NA NA
Naaf(♂) × LB(♀) ZG39 68 68 NA NA NA NA NA

The cross type indicated the origin of the parental populations (Broel, Naaf, LB, WN) and the gender of the parental generation. Individual mapping families are listed together with the total number of offspring that were raised and used for map construction or to QTL map sex. The numbers of males and females are given for each mapping family. Sex ratios were found to be significantly skewed toward a male excess in family ZG46, but this pattern was not generally observed.