Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2013 Oct 9;108(12):10.1111/add.12335. doi: 10.1111/add.12335

Table 1.

Summary of intervention costs, outcomes, and incremental differences over four-year follow-up

Condition Intervention Cost ($) Days Abstinent Number of Substance Use-Related Problems
OM plus RMC (N = 223) 4,889 (52.56)
[4,784; 4,993]
1,026 (20.94)
[983; 1,068]
89 (7.29)
[74.72; 104]
OM only (N = 223) 2,705 (23.84)
[2,640; 2,749]
932 (25.05)
[881; 983]
126 (9.20)
[107; 145]
Incremental Differencea $2,184* (57.19)
[2,075; 2,313]
94* (33.18)
[27.56; 160]
37* (11.55)
[13.03; 60.36]
ICERb -- 23.38 (68.37)
[−46.53; 93.29]
59.51 (84.97)
[−1,791; 1,910]

Notes: Bootstrapped means and standard errors reported (1,000 replications). Standard errors in parentheses and 95% confidence intervals in brackets.

*

p<0.001

Incremental differences may not be exact due to rounding errors. Intervention costs based on study by Dennis et al., (2011) [25] in which costs are reported in 2007 dollars.

a

The difference in cost or outcome measured between the two conditions: OM-plus-RMC vs. OM-only.

b

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio describing the cost per day abstinent and per reduced substance-use-related problem.