Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 15;6(6):1733–1737. doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1626

Table I.

Correlation between clinicopathological factors and expression of miR-21 in serum.

Clinicopathological factors n miR-21 expression (mean ± SD) P-value
Gender 0.504
 Male 68 −0.611±0.509
 Female 35 −0.705±0.434
Age 0.712
 ≤60 53 −0.653±0.491
 >60 50 −0.631±0.483
Tumor size 0.048a
 ≤5 cm 52 −0.713±0.507
 >5 cm 51 −0.571±0.455
Tumor thickness 0.021a
 pT1 18 −0.798±0.507
 pT2 + pT3 12 −0.577±0.547
 pT4a 52 −0.712±0.407
 pT4b 21 −0.375±0.531
Nodal status 0.376
 pN0 25 −0.778±0.543
 pN1 14 −0.592±0.521
 pN2 17 −0.526±0.462
 pN3 47 −0.628±0.447
Distant metastasis 0.196
 M0 89 −0.667±0.491
 M1 14 −0.486±0.425
Venous invasion 0.750
 Positive 28 −0.617±0.486
 Negative 75 −0.652±0.485
Tumor differentiation 0.443
 Poor 59 −0.611±0.452
 Moderate/well 44 −0.685±0.528
UICC stage 0.238
 I + II 31 −0.744±0.509
 III 58 −0.626±0.481
 IV 14 −0.486±0.425
Surgery type 0.100
 Radical 80 −0.690±0.470
 Palliative 23 −0.478±0.508
a

Indicates a significant difference (P<0.05).

Since the relative quantity (Qrel) was logarithmic, Qrel was transformed through logarithmic transformation into linear distribution for statistical convenience. The negative expression values indicated that miR-21 was expressed less than arbitrary samples. UICC, Union for International Cancer Control; SD, standard deviation.