Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 20.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2012 Mar 13;26(5):10.1097/QAD.0b013e328350fbfb. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328350fbfb

Table 1.

Main model input parameters

Base case value Sensitivity analyses (4)
References
Range Type



Baseline characteristics
 Mean age, years (SD) 33.6 (7.7) [26 – 41] CI (24)
 Mean CD4, cells/μl (SD) 154 (102) [52 – 256] CI (20)
 Sex, female, % 100
 Plasma HIV-1 RNA, copies/ml, %
  >100,000 52.6 (24)
  30,001–10,0000 21.8 (24)
  10,001–30,000 13.1 (24)
  3,001–10,000 5.5 (24)
  501–3,000 3.1 (24)
  ≤ 500 3.9 (24)
Monitoring
 Interval between clinic visits, months 3 1; 6 months Extr. values ASMPT
 Interval between CD4 tests, months 6 3; 12 months Extr. values ASMPT
First-line ART efficacy and toxicity
 HIV-1 RNA suppression at 24 weeks, % (1) 80.2 [65 – 85] Extr. Values (2, 20)
 CD4 cell/μl increase at 24 weeks (1) 152 (20)*
 Toxicity, %
  EFV:
   Drug discontinuation 0.1 [0 – 6.3] Extr. values (8)
   Fatal toxicity (2) 0.1 [0 – 1.0] Extr. values (27)
  NVP:
   Drug discontinuation 6.3 [4.3 – 8.3] CI (8)
   Fatal toxicity (2) 1.0 [0 – 3.0] Extr. values (28)
Pregnancy
 Pregnancy rate, per 100 woman-years (3) 7.9 [5.0 – 15.0] Extr. values (9)
 Outcomes, %
  Abortion 11.7 (29)
  Miscarriage 5.2 (29)
  Stillborn 6.7 (29)
  Live births (3) 76.4 [60.0 – 85.0] Extr. values (29) (9, 34)
   Birth defects, %
    EFV 2.9 (30)
    NVP 2.7 (30)

EFV: ART regimen including efavirenz and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir + emtricitabine); NVP: ART regimen including nevirapine and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir + emtricitabine);

(1)

In the base case analysis we assumed that EFV and NVP had the same immunological and virological efficacy;

(2)

In the base case analysis we assumed that 0.1% of the 0.1% patients who had major toxicity on EFV died (0.001 × 0.001 = 0.00001), and 1% of the 6.3% patients who had major toxicity on NVP died (0.063 × 0.01 = 0.00063);

(3)

In the base case analysis we assumed that women on EFV or NVP had the same rate of pregnancy and live birth;

(4)

In one-way sensitivity analysis, we varied each parameter within the range of confidence interval (CI) or of highest or lowest values (Extreme values - Extr.values) as found in the literature. The column ‘references’ refers to the papers where CI and extreme values were found (ASMPT: assumption).