Skip to main content
. 2013 May 10;5(2):277–293. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics5020277

Table 2.

Drug loading and loading efficiency (mean ± SEM) into zein microparticles formulated using various combinations of zein and hydrocortisone, with the coefficient of variation (%CV) for within and between replicates. One-way factorial ANOVA with a post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons test was used to compare selected means (p < 0.05).

Zein (mg) Drug (mg) Ratio %CV Total mean ± SEM Total %CV
Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3
Hydrocortisone loading (w/w%)
800 200 4 7.71 15.43 3.01 5.41 ± 0.60 a 19
600 150 4 7.41 2.97 1.90 4.72 ± 0.05 ab 2
200 50 4 5.66 3.98 21.67 2.84 ± 0.25 b 16
400 200 2 1.07 7.36 6.37 2.69 ± 0.08 x 5
400 150 2.7 5.25 4.87 7.98 3.68 ± 0.86 x 40
400 100 4 10.11 1.95 9.44 3.31 ± 0.20 b,x 11
400 50 8 3.11 8.16 8.49 3.66 ± 0.28 x 13
400 25 16 2.18 25.09 11.25 3.77 ± 0.44 x 20
Hydrocortisone loading efficiency (w/w%)
800 200 4 6.66 12.64 3.42 33.13 ± 4.55 A 24
600 150 4 4.28 2.80 2.38 27.47 ± 2.28 AB 14
200 50 4 8.31 1.56 27.00 16.03 ± 1.38 B 15
400 200 2 4.40 10.47 11.18 9.44 ± 0.17 X 3
400 150 2.7 5.53 1.48 19.01 14.54 ± 2.63 X 31
400 100 4 26.98 7.51 19.66 20.66 ± 0.39 B,X 3
400 50 8 5.16 6.05 4.27 40.55 ± 1.64 Y 7
400 25 16 1.98 3.78 1.27 84.18 ± 2.40 Z 5

Means were grouped as follows for statistical analysis, with the means that were not significantly different at p < 0.05 assigned the same letter: varying quantities with constant ratio of zein and hydrocortisone (a–b, A–B), constant quantity of zein with varying hydrocortisone quantity (x, X–Z).