Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 29;1(3):e00039. doi: 10.1002/phy2.39

Table 2.

Gravimetric data

Female Male


Genotype Sham TAC Sham TAC
FWS FWC FWH MWS MWC MWH
W Mice (n) 4 4 4 4 4 4
BW (g) 20 ± 1 22 ± 1 22 ± 1 31 ± 1 28 ± 0.2 28.4 ± 1.4
LVW (mg) 79 ± 3 116 ± 6* 154 ± 9* 112 ± 4† 158 ± 4* 171 ± 2*
HW/TL (mg/mm) 6.6 ± 0.3 8.8 ± 0.4* 13 ± 1*$ 8.4 ± 0.2 12 ± 0.4* 13.0 ± 0.4*
Lu W/TL (mg/mm) 8.6 ± 0.5 8.8 ± 0.3 24 ± 4*$ 9.1 ± 0.3 9.5 ± 0.6 18.1 ± 2.4*$
K FKS FKC FKH MKS MKC MKH
Mice (n) 4 4 4 4 4 4
BW (g) 20 ± 1 23 ± 1 22 ± 1 28 ± 2 28 ± 1 25 ± 3
LVW(mg) 73 ± 4 127 ± 10* 179 ± 2* 110 ± 10† 154 ±15 181 ± 18*
HW/TL (mg/mm) 6.4 ± 0.4 9.9 ± 0.8* 14 ± 0.3*$ 8.5 ± 0.4 11 ± 1* 13.9 ± 1.6*$
Lu W/TL (mg/mm) 8.5 ± 0.5 9.9 ± 0.3* 21 ± 3*$ 8.7 ± 0.4 9.3 ± 0.2* 14.4 ± 3.4*$

Data are mean ± SEM. W, wild-type mice; K, FKBP12.6 overexpressing mice; S, sham-operated; TAC, thoracic aortic constriction; F, female; M, male; C, noncongested mice; H, mice with congestive heart failure; BW, body weight; LVW; left ventricle weight; HW/TL, ratio heart weight to tibia length; Lu/TL, ratio lung weight to tibia length. *P < 0.05 TAC versus sham; $P < 0.05 C versus H mice; †P < 0.05 female versus male.