Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 25;2(5):e000268. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000268

Table 2.

Physicians' ECG Interpretation Accuracy by Specialty and Experience

# of ECG Interpretations Sens Spec PPV NPV Kappa C
Computer algorithm 36 46 83 85 44 n/a 0.65
All participants 4365 65 79 86 53 0.33 0.72
By training level
All residents 1332 61 73 82 48 0.27 0.67
All fellows 1188 63 86 90 54 0.33 0.74
All attendings 1872 70 79 87 57 0.36 0.75
By specialty
Interventional cardiologists 502 70 89 92 59 0.42 0.79
Non‐invasive cardiologists 1505 63 85 90 54 0.41 0.74
All cardiologists 2007 65 86 90 55 0.41 0.75
Cardiology trainees 1080 63 87 90 54 0.4 0.75
Cardiology attendings 936 67 86 90 57 0.43 0.76
Emergency physicians 1259 70 72 83 55 0.3 0.71
All non‐cardiologists 2358 66 73 83 52 0.28 0.7
Non‐cardiology trainees* 1457 61 74 82 49 0.26 0.67
Emergency med attendings 936 74 72 84 58 0.35 0.73

Highest values are bolded. Attendings are physicians board‐certified in their area of specialty. C is the area under the ROC curve. ECG indicates electrocardiogram; NPV, negative predictive values; PPV, positive predictive values; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; Sens, sensitivity; Spec, specificity.

*

Noncardiology trainees were internal medicine and emergency medicine residents and fellows.