Abstract
Diversely functionalized imidazole-4-carboxylates were synthesized by microwave-assisted 1,5-eletrocyclization of 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene-derived azavinyl azomethine ylides. 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes were treated with primary aliphatic or aromatic amines and subjected to microwave irradiation in the presence of aldehydes. 3-Alkyl- and 3-arylimidazole-4-carboxylates were prepared in good yields through a one-pot multicomponent procedure. Modulation of the substituents at C-2, N-3 and C-5 was possible, and 2-unsubstituted imidazoles were obtained when paraformaldehyde was used.
Keywords: Azomethine ylides, Electrocyclic reactions, Microwave chemistry, Multicomponent reactions, Nitrogen heterocycles
Introduction
The field of organic synthesis has witnessed a dramatic surge in the application of microwave irradiation as an alternative to conventional heating. In most cases, microwave heating has resulted in drastic reduction of reaction times, improvement of workup procedures and, ultimately, increased product yields in comparison to classical heating.[1] To date, microwave irradiation has been applied successfully to a broad array of reaction types,[1] and has become a standard tool in organic synthesis. Microwave-enhanced cycloadditions have also been reported,[2] including [3 + 2] cycloadditions of azomethine ylides.[3]
Recently, we have reported the successful synthesis of α-imidazol-1-yl esters via 1,5-electrocyclization of azavinyl azomethine ylides that were ultimately derived from 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes (henceforth DDs)[4] and aziridines[5] or by sequential reaction with α-aminoesters and aldehydes.[6] In particular, conjugated azavinyl azomethine ylides were generated by refluxing DD-derived α-aminoester hydrazones in toluene in the presence of aldehydes, and were found to undergo an original 1,5-electrocyclization to imidazoles.[5,6] To follow up our work, we envisioned replacing α-aminoesters with primary aliphatic or aromatic amines, which would allow a more general access to simpler imidazole-4-carboxylates in a one-pot fashion without the need of isolating reaction intermediates. Initial attempts with α-aminohydrazones under the same reactions conditions[5,6] did provide the desired imidazole-4-carboxylates in very modest yields. Since charged chemical species or intermediates are well known to benefit from microwave irradiation, as in the case of 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions,[3] we reasoned that our 1,5-electrocyclization of DD-derived azavinyl azomethine ylides could be likewise enhanced by employing microwave heating.
Results and Discussion
DDs 1a–b were reacted with the appropriate amine in acetonitrile at r.t. until complete decolouration occurred. In the case of DD 1a, the compound was freshly prepared from the parent chlorohydrazone by preliminary treatment with triethylamine in acetonitrile at rt, and used as such without further purification for the following reaction. Subsequent treatment with paraformaldehyde in a sealed vessel under microwave irradiation at 150 °C for 20 min afforded 2-unsubstituted 3H-imidazole-4-carboxylates 2a–i generally in good yields (Table 1), with the exception of 2f (Table 1, entries 11 and 12), most presumably due to partial loss of the tert-butyl substituent at nitrogen under the reaction conditions employed. Yields with DD 1b were generally comparable to those with in situ generated 1a. Aliphatic and aromatic amines (Table 1, entries 1–14 and 15–18, respectively) performed equally well. When (R)-α-phenylethylamine was used (Table 1, entries 7 and 8), enantiomerically pure imidazole 2d was recovered (ee > 95%). Using microwave irradiation, the reaction resulted in higher yields and shorter reaction times than with conventional heating, i.e. refluxing in toluene. In particular, yields for imidazoles 2a and 2e were in the 51–55% range under classical conditions, but rose to 71–77% when microwave heating was employed.
Table 1.
One-pot synthesis of 2-unsubstituted 3H-imidazole-4-carboxylates 2a–i.
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | DD
|
Amine | Imidazole | 2 | Yield[a] (%) | |
| 1 | Y | |||||
| 1 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2a | 78 |
| 2 | 1b | CONH2 | 77 | |||
| 3 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2b | 86 |
| 4 | 1b | CONH2 | 62 | |||
| 5 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2c | 83 |
| 6 | 1b | CONH2 | 62 | |||
| 7 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2d | 75 |
| 8 | 1b | CONH2 | 80 | |||
| 9 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2e | 83 |
| 10 | 1b | CONH2 | 71 | |||
| 11 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2f | 44 |
| 12 | 1b | CONH2 | 50 | |||
| 13 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2g | 75 |
| 14 | 1b | CONH2 | 69 | |||
| 15 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2h | 80 |
| 16 | 1b | CONH2 | 31 | |||
| 17 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2i | 76 |
| 18 | 1b | CONH2 | 70 | |||
Isolated yield (after silica gel chromatography) based on starting material, viz. DD 1b or the corresponding chlorohydrazone in the case of 1a.
DD 1a was prepared in situ from the parent chlorohydrazone and used without further purification.
Encouraged by the success with paraformaldehyde, we sought to extend the scope of this one-pot protocol by varying the aldehyde partner. Treatment of DD 1b and in situ generated 1a with benzylamine in acetonitrile at r.t. and subsequent microwave heating in the presence of aliphatic or aromatic aldehydes under the same reaction conditions afforded 2-substituted 3-benzyl imidazole-4-carboxylates 2j–o in moderate to good yields (Table 2). In the case of butanal and phenylacetaldehyde, yields were excellent with in situ prepared 1a (Table 2, entries 1 and 4), but dropped when DD 1b was used (entries 2 and 5). When butanal was replaced with its dimethyl acetal, imidazole 2j was still obtained, albeit in lower yield (Table 2, entry 3). Yields were only moderate with benzaldehyde, either by using 1a or 1b as the starting material (Table 2, entries 10 and 11).
Table 2.
One-pot synthesis of 2-substituted 3-benzyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylates 2j–o.
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | DD
|
Aldehyde | Imidazole | 2 | Yield[a] (%) | |
| 1 | Y | |||||
| 1 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2j | 87 |
| 2 | 1b | CONH2 | 37 | |||
| 3 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
49 | ||
| 4 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2k | 79 |
| 5 | 1b | CONH2 | 48 | |||
| 6 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2l | 50 |
| 7 | 1b | CONH2 | 40 | |||
| 8 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2m | 74 |
| 9 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2n | 61 |
| 10 | 1a[b] | COOEt |
|
|
2o | 50 |
| 11 | 1b | CONH2 | 44 | |||
Isolated yield (after silica gel chromatography) based on starting material, viz. DD 1b or the corresponding chlorohydrazone in the case of 1a.
DD 1a was prepared in situ from the parent chlorohydrazone and used without further purification.
When benzylamine and either paraformadehyde or butanal were added simultaneously, rather than sequentially, to freshly formed DD 1a, and the resulting solution was subjected immediately to microwave irradiation, imidazoles 2a or 2j were isolated in 71 and 70% yield, respectively. Strictly speaking, therefore, the whole process displays a multicomponent character, as all reagents can be mixed at the same time without affecting the reaction outcome and, importantly, with comparable overall yields.
Whilst simple variations of the aldehyde or amine partners allowed the access to imidazoles 4-carboxylates with different functionalities at C-2 and N-3, respectively, modulation of the substituent at C-5 required the use of an appropriate DD as the starting material. Therefore, additional DDs 1c–f were allowed to react with benzylamine or allylamine in the presence of paraformaldehyde under the same conditions. 5-Alkyl and 5-arylimidazole-4-carboxylates 2p–w were isolated in moderate to good yields (Table 3). In particular, yields were higher for imidazoles 2p–s having an ethyl or a propyl side chain (Table 3, entries 1–4), whereas DD 1f gave 5-phenylimidazoles 2v,w only in moderate yields (Table 3, entries 7,8). Use of benzylamine or allylamine always resulted in comparable yields, except for DD 1e which afforded the corresponding 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-imidazoles in good yield only for the latter (Table 3, entries 5,6).
Table 3.
One-pot synthesis of 2-unsubstituted 3H-imidazole-4-carboxylates 2p–w using benzyamine or allylamine.
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | DD
|
Imidazole | 2 | Yield[a] (%) | |
| 1 | |||||
| 1 | 1c[b] |
|
|
2p | 69 |
| 2 | 1c[b] |
|
|
2q | 78 |
| 3 | 1d |
|
|
2r | 87 |
| 4 | 1d |
|
|
2s | 81 |
| 5 | 1e |
|
|
2t | 59 |
| 6 | 1e |
|
|
2u | 68 |
| 7 | 1f |
|
|
2v | 57 |
| 8 | 1f |
|
|
2w | 62 |
Isolated yield (after silica gel chromatography) based on starting material, viz. DD 1d–f or the corresponding chlorohydrazone in the case of 1c.
DD 1c was prepared in situ from the parent chlorohydrazone and used without further purification.
A rationale mechanism for the formation of imidazole-4-carboxylates 2a–w is depicted in Scheme 1. Michael-type 1,4-conjugate addition of DDs 1a–f (either as an isolated compound or in situ generated from the corresponding chlorohydrazone by treatment with TEA in the case of 1a,c) with the primary amine gives α-aminohydrazone A[4e] which in turn condenses with the aldehyde partner to yield iminium ion B. Microwave-assisted heating may result in the formation of conjugated azavinyl azomethine ylide[7,8] C which undergoes 1,5-electrocyclization to 2,3-dehydroimidazole-4-carboxylate D and, eventually, aromatization with loss of carbamate or urea, thus affording the desired 3H-imidazole-4-carboxylates 2a–w, by analogy to the formation of DD-derived α-imidazol-1-yl esters we have recently disclosed.[5,6]
Scheme 1.
Postulated mechanism for the formation of imidazole-4-carboxylates 2a–w from DDs 1a–f.
Microwave irradiation has been already employed for the preparation of aryl or alkyl 2,4,5-trisubstituted and 1,2,4,5-tetrasubstituted imidazoles.[9,10] In particular, a three-component reaction between 1,2-diketones and aldehydes in the presence of ammonium acetate was used for the synthesis of 2,4,5-triaryl- and -trialkylimidazoles,[9] whereas a four-component variant that also included aliphatic or aromatic amines gave 1,2,4,5-tetrasubstituted imidazoles.[9b–c,i,10] In most of these cases, however, the resulting imidazole products displayed a rather low degree of functionalization that preclude further chemistries. The present method, by contrast, allows the preparation of functionalized imidazoles whose substituents are amenable to subsequent manipulations, especially in the framework of target-driven multistep syntheses.
Conclusions
We have reported a significant extension of the 1,5-electrocyclization of conjugated azavinyl azomethine ylides[5,6] to substituted imidazole-4-carboxylates by one-pot sequential reaction between DDs and primary amines, followed by microwave-assisted heating in the presence of aldehydes. The method is efficient and straightforward and does not require isolation of intermediates. Moreover, appropriate choice of the amine, aldehyde and DD partners makes possible the modulation of substituents at the N-3, C-2 and C-5 atoms of the final product, respectively. Noteworthily, the reaction can be also performed in a multicomponent fashion by simply mixing the three partners at r.t. and subjecting them to microwave irradiation. Such a one-pot multicomponent approach is most flexible and useful for the synthesis of functionalized imidazole-4-carboxylates starting from readily available materials such as aliphatic or aromatic primary amines and aldehydes, and nicely adds to the variety of available methods to access the biologically important and pharmaceutically relevant imidazole skeleton.[11]
Experimental Section
General Methods
Microwave-assisted reactions were performed in sealed glass vials using a temperature- and pressure-controlled single-mode microwave reactor (CEM, Discover LabMate) equipped with a 300 W power source. Temperature and pressure were set at 150 °C and 150 psi, respectively, power source at 150 W. Such values were reached within 5 min and were maintained for further 20 min by means of IR sensor thermal control and pressure feedback control. Commercial grade acetonitrile was used without further purification as reaction solvent. 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) 1a–b were synthesized as already described and occur both as a mixture of E/Z isomers.[12] Whereas DD 1b is a shelf-stable red crystalline compound,[12b] DD 1a[12a] is a somewhat unstable red liquid that tends to decompose upon prolonged storage. Therefore, 1a was always generated in situ by treatment of the parent chlorohydrazone with triethylamine in acetonitrile at rt, and the resulting red solution was used as such for the subsequent chemistry without further purification. 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) 1c–f were synthesized according to the procedure described below. Amines and aldehydes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received, except for thiophen-2-yl-acetaldehyde, phenoxyacetaldehyde and 2-phenoxypropanal (used for the synthesis of imidazole-4-carboxylates 2l, 2m and 2n, respectively) which were prepared by reduction of the parent methyl ester with DIBALH by analogy to a literature procedure[13] (see Supporting Information). Chromatographic purification of compounds was performed on silica gel (60–200 μm) using the appropriate eluant as specified; commercially grade light petroleum/ethyl acetate mixtures were used for such purpose. Pre-loaded (0.25 mm) glass supported silica gel plates (Kieselgel 60, Merck) were used for TLC analysis and compounds were visualized by exposure to UV light and by dipping the plates in 1% Ce(SO4)•4H2O, 2.5% (NH4)6Mo7O24•4H2O in 10% sulphuric acid followed by heating on a hot plate. Melting points were determined in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 solution at 25 °C on Bruker 200 or 400 MHz instruments. Multiplicity is given as s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, sex = sextet, m = multiplet and br = broad signal, and chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm downfield from tetramethylsilane as internal standard. Coupling constants (3JH,H) are given in Hz. COSY, HSQC and HMBC experiments were performed to aid in the assignment of 1H and 13C resonances. Mass spectra were recorded in the EI mode (70 eV). For elemental analyses, a Carlo Erba Elemental Analyzer (model 1110) was used. The enantiomeric excess (ee) of imidazole 2d was determined by chiral HPLC analysis (Jasco PU-980) using a Lux Cellulose-1 column (5 μm; 250 × 4.6 mm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, US). The mobile phase consisted of n-hexane/isopropanol 9:1 (v/v) under isocratic elution at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1 at 20 °C; samples were dissolved in n-hexane/isopropanol 1:1 (v/v) and injection volume was 20 μL. Detection was performed at 254 nm using a variable wavelength detector (Jasco UV-1575). Accuracy was within ±5%.
1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) 1c–f were synthesized as follows
Procedure for the synthesis of DDs 1c–e
Commercially available methyl 2-chloro-3-oxopentanoate (5 mmol), or freshly prepared (see below) ethyl 2-chloro-3-oxo-hexanoate (5 mmol) or dimethyl 2-chloro-3-oxopentanedioate (5 mmol) were added to a magnetically stirred solution of semicarbazide hydrochloride (5 mmol, pretreated with an equimolecular amount of sodium acetate) or methyl carbazate (5 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (50 mL, 1c) or methanol (50 mL, 1d,e). The reaction was magnetically stirred at r.t. until the disappearance of the reagents (TLC). The reaction solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, the crude α-chloro-hydrazone was dissolved in ethyl acetate and washed with aqueous saturated solution of sodium carbonate (50 mL×2) and with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (1%, 50 mL×1, only for 1c,d). Ethyl acetate was removed under reduced pressure and the crude residue purified by chromatography on silica gel column, affording DDs 1c–e.
Ethyl 2-chloro-3-oxo-hexanoate or dimethyl 2-chloro-3-oxopentanedioate required for the synthesis of DDs 1d,e, were prepared from the parent ethyl 3-oxo-hexanoate (5 mmol) or dimethyl 3-oxopentanedioate (5 mmol) by chlorination with sulfuryl chloride (SO2Cl2) (5.5 mmol.). The reaction was performed in dichloromethane (10 mL) at r.t. under magnetic stirring for 15–30 min (monitored by TLC and/or 1H-NMR). Thereafter, the reaction mixture was washed with brine (5×30 mL), dried (MgSO4), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure affording the desired α-chloro hydrazone as a colourless oil.
Procedure for the synthesis of DD 1f
Ethyl 3 oxo-3-phenylpropanoate (5 mmol) was treated with 1 equiv. of tert butyl carbazate (5 mmol) and a catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid in the minimum amount of tetrahydrofuran (5 mL). The reaction mixture was allowed to react at r.t. for 48 h: the desired hydrazone separates as a white solid, which was recovered by filtration and washed with light petroleum ether. The hydrazone was then dissolved in dichloromethane and 1.1 equiv. of sulfuryl chloride was added at r.t. and the resulting solution was allowed to react for 30 min under magnetical stirring. Thereafter the reaction mixture was washed with brine (5×30 mL), and the organic layer was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to give α-chloro hydrazone as a pale yellow oil.
Finally, addition of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (1.0 equiv.) to a magnetically stirred solution of the α-chloro hydrazone in the minimum amount of dichloromethane at r.t. for 5 min assisted to the 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene formation. The resulting red-orange solution was directly purified by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 90:10) to give DD 1f as a somewhat unstable red liquid that tends to decompose upon storage.
4-Methoxycarbonyl-3-ethyl-1-metoxycarbonyl-1,2-diaza-1,3-diene (1c)
DD 1c was isolated (540 mg, 54%) by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 90:10). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.84 (s, 1H, CH), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.83 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 1.01 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 168.4 (CO2CH3), 165.7 (NCO2CH3), 162.7 (C-3), 131.1 (C-4), 54.9 (OCH3), 52.0 (OCH3), 17.7 (CH2), 12.2 (CH3) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 200 (M+, 1), 167 (2), 149 (5), 125 (10), 111 (22), 97 (38), 83 (39), 69 (60), 57 (100). C8H12N2O4 (200.08): calcd. C 48.00, H 6.04, N 13.99; found C 47.81, H 6.31, N 14.23
4-Ethoxycarbonyl-3-propyl-1-aminocarbonyl-1,2-diaza-1,3-diene (1d)
DD 1d was isolated (499 mg, 47%) by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 65:35). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.87 (s, 1H, CH), 6.23 and 6.02 (br, 2H, NH2), 4.29 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.85 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.43 (sex, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.37 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH2CH2CH3), 0.91 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.4 (CO2CH2CH3), 165.4 (NCO2NH2), 161.1 (C-3), 132.1 (C-4), 61.1 (OCH2CH3), 26.3 (CH2CH2CH3), 21.3 (CH2CH2CH3), 14.1 (2CH3) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 170 (3), 141 (27), 125 (72), 113 (50), 99 (60), 85 (24), 67 (66), 55 (100). C9H15N3O3 (213.11): calcd. C 50.69, H 7.09, N 19.71; found C 50.47, H 7.33, N 19.63.
4-Methoxycarbonyl-3-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethyl)-1-aminocarbonyl-1,2-diaza-1,3-diene (1e)
DD 1e was isolated (492 mg, 43%) by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 40:60). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.21 (s, 1H, CH), 6.28 and 6.02 (br, 2H, NH2), 4.03 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.86 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.66 (s, 2H, CH2CO2Me) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 169.1 (CH2CO2CH3), 165.5 (CO2CH3), 161.2 (NCO2NH2), 158.9 (C-3), 135.2 (C-4), 52.3 (2OCH3), 30.4 (CH2) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 155 (68), 126 (56), 98 (100), 85 (70), 68 (58), 59 (100). C8H11N3O5 (229.07): calcd. C 41.92, H 4.84, N 18.33; found C 42.07, H 4.67, N 18.09.
4-Ethoxycarbonyl-3-phenyl-1-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1,2-diaza-1,3-diene (1f)
DD 1f was isolated (851 mg, 56%) by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 90:10). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.42– 7.37 (m, 3H, CHAr), 7.24–7.20 (m, 2H, CHAr), 6.92 (s, 1H, CH), 4.11 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, OCH2CH3), 1.59 (s, 9H, (CH3)3), 1.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, OCH2CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 164.8 (CO2CH2CH3), 163.0 (NCO2t-Bu), 161.2 (C-3), 134.2 (CHAr), 130.4 (C-4), 129.4 (CHAr), 129.0 (CHAr), 127.8 (CHAr), 85.6 (C(CH3)3), 60.9 (OCH2CH3), 27.7 ((CH3)3), 13.8 (CH3) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 176 (27), 21(16), 131 (100), 103 (64), 77 (30). C16H20N2O4 (304.14): calcd. C 63.14, H 6.62, N 9.20; found C 63.01, H 6.85, N 9.04.
Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Imidazole-4-carboxylates from DDs 1a,c (Method A)
2-Chloro-3-(ethoxycarbonylhydrazono)-butanoic acid ethyl ester[12] (0.6 mmol) or 2-Chloro-3-(methoxycarbonylhydrazono)-pentanoic acid methyl ester (0.6 mmol) is dissolved in acetonitrile (2 mL) in a microwave glass vial and treated with TEA (84 μL, 0.6 mmol) at r.t. under magnetic stirring to give a red solution. The primary amine (0.63 mmol) is added and the resulting solution is stirred until complete decolouration, whereupon the aldehyde (1.2 mmol) is added. The vessel containing the pale yellow mixture is then sealed and heated under microwave irradiation at 150 °C for 20 min. After removal of the solvent in vacuo, purification by column chromatography affords the desired imidazole.
Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Imidazole-4-carboxylates from DDs 1b,d–f (Method B)
A solution of DD 1b[12b],d–f (0.54 mmol) in acetonitrile (2 mL) in a microwave glass vial equipped with a stir bar is treated with the amine (0.57 mmol) at r.t. until complete decolouration. The aldehyde (1.08 mmol) is added, and the vessel with the resulting light yellow mixture is sealed and heated under microwave irradiation at 150 °C for 20 min. The solvent is evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude residue is purified by column chromatography to yield the desired imidazole-4-carboxylate.
Ethyl 3-benzyl-5-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2a)
Imidazole 2a was isolated (method A: 114 mg, 78; method B: 101 mg, 77%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a pale yellow solid, mp 54–56 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.72 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.33 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.18 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.52 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.30 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.56 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.7 (C=O), 147.6 (C-5), 140.0 (C-2), 136.3 (C-1′), 128. 9 (C-3′, C-5′), 128.1 (C-4′), 127.2 (C-2′, C-6′), 118.8 (C-4), 60.5 (CH3CH2O), 50.9 (CH2Ph), 15.6 (CH3), 14.2 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 244 (M+, 14), 198 (12), 109 (8), 91 (100), 65 (10). C14H16N2O2 (244.12): calcd. C 68.83, H 6.60, N 11.47; found C 70.12, H 6.92, N 11.79.
Ethyl 3-allyl-5-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2b)
Imidazole 2b was isolated (method A: 100 mg, 86%; method B: 65 mg, 62%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a yellow liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.48 (s, 1H, H-2), 5.93 (ddt, J = 17.1, 10.3, 5.5 Hz, 1H, CH2CH), 5.14 (ddd, J = 10.3, 2.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H, Hcis), 5.01 (ddd, J = 17.1, 2.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H, Htrans), 4.82 (dt, J = 5.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H, NCH2), 4.26 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.31 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.9 (C=O), 148.0 (C-5), 139.9 (C-2), 133.3 (NCH2CH), 118.5 (C-4), 117.7 (CHCH2), 60.3 (CH3CH2O), 49.4 (CH2N), 15.8 (CH3C), 14.3 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 194 (M+, 68), 165 (58), 149 (67), 121 (78), 109 (33), 94 (25), 80 (21), 67 (24), 54 (22), 41 (100). C10H14N2O2 (194.11): calcd. C 61.84, H 7.27, N 14.42; found C 62.09, H 7.07, N 14.71.
Ethyl 5-methyl-3-prop-2-ynyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2c)
Imidazole 2c was isolated (method A: 96 mg, 83%; method B: 64 mg, 62%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30) as a pale yellow solid, mp 56–58 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.51 (s, 1H, H-2), 4.82 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, NCH2), 4.10 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.27 (t, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.14 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.00 (C=O), 148.6 (C-5), 139.6 (C-2), 118.4 (C-4), 76.8 (C≡CH), 74.9 (C≡CH), 60.5 (CH3CH2O), 37.1 (NCH2), 15.8 (CH3C), 14.3 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 192 (M+, 19), 163 (100), 147 (28), 136 (20), 119 (11), 109 (29), 92 (13), 65 (17), 52 (16), 39 (55). C10H12N2O2 (192.09): calcd. C 62.49, H 6.29, N 14.57; found C 62.74, H 6.44, N 14.80.
Ethyl (3R)-5-methyl-3-(1-phenylethyl)-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2d)
Imidazole 2d was isolated (method A: 116 mg, 75%; method B: 112 mg, 80%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a pale yellow liquid, [α]D +48.3 (c 1.5, CH2Cl2), ee 98% (by chiral HPLC analysis). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.25 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.10 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 6.27 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, NCH), 4.22 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH3CH), 4.20 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH3CH2O), 2.45 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.78 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.9 (C=O), 147.8 (C-5), 141.3 (C-1′), 137.7 (C-2), 128.8 (C-3′, C-5′), 127.9 (C-4′), 126.2 (C-2′, C-6′), 118.8 (C-4), 60.4 (CH3CH2O), 55.9 (NCH), 22.3 (NCHCH3), 15.8 (CH3C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 258 (M+, 5), 154 (8), 105 (100), 77 (15). C15H18N2O2 (258.14): calcd. C 69.74, H 7.02, N 10.84; found C 70.02, H 7.30, N 11.04.
Ethyl 3-sec-butyl-5-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2e)
Imidazole 2e was isolated (method A: 105 mg, 83%; method B: 81 mg, 71%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a pale yellow liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.67 (s, 1H, H-2), 5.05 (m, 1H, CH), 4.30 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.47 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.77 (m, 2H, CH3CH2CH), 1.43 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CH3CH), 1.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O), 0.85 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2CH) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.2 (C=O), 147.4 (C-5), 136.9 (C-2), 118.6 (C-4), 60.3 (CH3CH2O), 54.0 (CH3CH2CH), 30.6 (CH3CH2CH), 21.2 (CH3CH), 15.9 (CH3C), 14.3 (CH3CH2O), 10.3 (CH3CH2CH) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 210 (M+, 39), 181 (8), 165 (14), 154 (17), 137 (25), 125 (95), 109 (100), 82 (17), 54 (17), 41 (27). C11H18N2O2 (210.14): calcd. C 62.83, H 8.63, N 13.32; found C 63.18, H 8.95, N 13.56.
Ethyl 3-tert-butyl-5-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2f)
Imidazole 2f was isolated (method A: 56 mg, 44%; method B: 57 mg, 50%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a pale yellow liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.73 (s, 1H, H-2), 4.30 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.68 (s, 9H, (CH3)3C), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.6 (C=O), 149.1 (C-5), 137.4 (C-2), 120.0 (C-4), 60.6 (CH3CH2O), 58.7 ((CH3)3C), 30.1 ((CH3)3C), 16.5 (CH3C), 14.3 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 210 (M+, 10), 154 (89), 125 (100), 109 (81), 82 (22), 57 (55), 41 (47). C11H18N2O2 (210.14): calcd. C 62.83, H 8.63, N 13.32; found C 63.04, H 8.88, N 13.65.
Ethyl 3-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-ethyl]-5-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2g)
Imidazole 2g was isolated (method A: 136 mg, 75%; method B: 113 mg, 69%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a pale yellow solid, mp 116–118 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.11 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.97 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 3H, H-3′,H-5′), 6.98 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.79 (s, 2H, CH2CO), 4.22 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 3.88 (s, 3H, CH3O), 2.57 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 189.9 (COCH2), 164.4 (C-4′), 160.6 (C=O), 145.4 (C-5), 140.4 (C-2), 130.4 (C-3′, C-5′), 127.3 (C-1′), 119.3 (C-4), 114.2 (C-2′, C-6′), 60.8 (CH3CH2O), 55.6 (CH3O), 53.3 (CH2CO), 14.9 (CH3C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 302 (M+, 3), 135 (100), 92 (7), 77 (11). C16H18N2O4 (302.13): calcd. C 63.56, H 6.00, N 9.27; found C 63.66, H 6.25, N 9.50.
Ethyl 5-methyl-3-phenyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2h)
Imidazole 2h was isolated (method A: 111 mg, 80%; method B: 39 mg, 31%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a pale yellow solid, mp 47–49 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.63 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.44 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.27 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 4.15 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.58 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.13 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.1 (C=O), 147.7 (C-5), 140.0 (C-2), 137.1 (C-1′), 128.89 (C-3′, C-5′), 128.86 (C-4′), 126.3 (C-2′, C-6′), 120.3 (C-4), 60.4 (CH3CH2O), 15.2 (CH3C), 14.0 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 230 (M+, 59), 201 (63), 185 (49), 158 (29), 130 (30), 104 (18), 77 (100), 51 (45). C13H14N2O2 (230.11): calcd. C 67.81, H 6.13, N 12.17; found C 68.11, H 6.30, N 12.44.
Ethyl 3-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-5-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2i)
Imidazole 2i was isolated (method A: 125 mg, 76%; method B: 103 mg, 70%) by column chromatography (petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50) as a pale brown solid, mp 96–98 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.11 (d, J = 9.0, 2H, H-3′, H-5′), 6.71 (d, J = 9.0, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 4.19 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 3.00 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 2.59 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.20 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.0 (C=O), 150.7 (C-4′), 146.0 (C-5), 139.7 (C-2), 126.9 (C-2′, C-6′), 125.4 (C-1′), 120.7 (C-4), 111.7 (C-3′, C-5′), 60.5 (CH3CH2O), 40.5 (N(CH3)2), 15.0 (CH3C), 14.1 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 273 (M+, 100), 227 (15), 200 (29), 173 (17), 159 (38), 147 (70), 132 (31), 121 (40), 113 (17), 105 (21), 86 (19), 77 (28), 42 (19). C15H19N3O2 (273.15): calcd. C 65.91, H 7.01, N 15.37; found C 66.33, H 7.45, N 15.60.
Ethyl 3-benzyl-5-methyl-2-propyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2j)
Imidazole 2j was isolated (method A: 149 mg, 87% using butanal, 84 mg, 49% using 1,1-dimethoxybutane; method B: 57 mg, 37%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.05 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 6.73 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.29 (s, 2H, NCH2Ph), 3.99 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.37 (t, J =7.9 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2CH2), 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.46 (m, J =7.7 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2CH2), 1.04 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O), 0.69 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2CH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.1 (C=O), 152.4 (C-2), 147.1 (C-5), 137.2 (C-1′), 128.7 (C-3′, C-5′), 127.4 (C-4′), 125.8 (C-2′, C-6′), 118.4 (C-4), 60.1 (CH3CH2O), 48.1 (NCH2), 29.0 (CH3CH2CH2), 21.3 (CH3CH2CH2), 15.8 (CH3C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O), 13.9 (CH3CH2CH2) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 286 (M+, 9), 257 (13), 167 (11), 91 (100), 65 (12). C17H22N2O2 (286.17): calcd. C 71.30, H 7.74, N 9.78; found C 71.67, H 7.90, N 10.02.
Ethyl 2,3-dibenzyl-5-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2k)
Imidazole 2k was isolated (method A: 159 mg, 79%; method B: 86 mg, 48%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.30–7.19 (m, 6H, H-3′–H-5′, H-3″–H-5″), 7.13 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 6.89 (m, 2H, H-2″, H-6″), 5.41 (s, 2H, NCH2Ph), 4.23 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 4.06 (s, 2H, CCH2Ph), 2.57 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.27 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.8 (C=O), 150.2 (C-2), 146.3 (C-5), 136.6 (C-1″), 135.7 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-3′, C-5′), 128. 8 (C-3″, C-5″), 128.4 (C-2′, C-6′), 127.5 (C-4″), 127.1 (C-4′), 125.8 (C-2″, C-6″), 119.2 (C-4), 60.4 (CH3CH2O), 48.4 (NCH2Ph), 33.4 (CCH2Ph), 15.6 (CH3C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 334 (M+, 14), 243 (12), 215 (9), 167 (13), 91 (100), 65 (13). C21H22N2O2 (334.17): calcd. C 75.42, H 6.63, N 8.38; found C 75.60, H 6.77, N 8.61.
Ethyl 3-benzyl-5-methyl-2-thiophen-2-ylmethyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2l)
Imidazole 2l was isolated (method A: 102 mg, 50%; method B: 74 mg, 40%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31–7.21 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.14 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.1 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 6.93 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, H-2″, H-6″), 6.88 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.6 Hz, 1H, H-4′), 6.75 (dd, J = 3.6, 1.1 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 5.49 (s, 2H, NCH2Ph), 4.23 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 4.17 (s, 2H, CCH2–C-2′), 2.54 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.1 (C=O), 149.6 (C-2), 147.2 (C-5), 138.2 (C-2′), 136.8 (C-1′), 128.8 (C-3″, C-5″), 127.4 (C-4′), 127.0 (C-4″), 125.9 (C-3′), 125.8 (C-2″, C-6″), 124.7 (C-5′), 119.2 (C-4), 60.2 (CH3CH2O), 48.4 (NCH2), 28.4 (CCH2–C-2′), 16.0 (CH3C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 340 (M+, 13), 249 (11), 173 (15), 91 (100), 65 (13). C19H20N2O2S (340.12): calcd. C 67.03, H 5.92, N 8.23, S 9.42; found C 66.72, H 6.25, N 8.39, S 9.18.
Ethyl 3-benzyl-5-methyl-2-phenoxymethyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2m)
Imidazole 2m was isolated (method A: 156 mg, 74%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30) as a brown solid, mp 51–53 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.28–7.22 (m, 5H, H-3′, H-5′, H-3″–H-5″), 7.01–6.93 (m, 3H, H-4′, H-2″, H-6″), 6.90 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.69 (s, 1H, NCH2Ph), 5.05 (s, 2H, CCH2O), 4.25 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.54 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.27 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.9 (C=O), 157.8 (C-1′), 147.0 (C-2), 146.6 (C-5), 137.0 (C-1″), 129. 6 (C-3′, C-5′), 128.7 (C-3″, C-5″), 127.4 (C-4″), 126.1 (C-2″, C-6″), 121.6 (C-4′), 120.3 (C-4), 114.8 (C-2′, C-6′), 62.5 (CCH2O), 60.4 (CH3CH2O), 48.8 (NCH2Ph), 15.9 (CH3C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 305 ([M – EtO]+, 1), 257 (18), 211 (19), 183 (2), 115 (3), 91 (100), 77 (3), 65 (12), 39 (4). C21H22N2O3 (350.16): calcd. C 71.98, H 6.33, N 7.99; found C 72.30, H 6.55, N 8.28.
Ethyl 3-benzyl-5-methyl-2-(1-phenoxyethyl)-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2n)
Imidazole 2n was isolated (Method A: 133 mg, 61%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.25–7.16 (m, 5H, H-3′, H-5′, H-3″–H-5″), 6.95–6.85 (m, 3H, H-4′, H-2″, H-6″), 6.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.78 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 5.58 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 5.50 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H, CH3CH), 4.19 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.55 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.65 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, CH3CH), 1.23 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.8 (C=O), 157.1 (C-1′), 150.3 (C-2), 146.9 (C-5), 137.4 (C-1″), 129.6 (C-3′, C-5′), 128.6 (C-3″, C-5″), 127.2 (C-4″), 125.7 (C-2″, C-6″), 121.6 (C-4′), 120.0 (C-4), 115.6 (C-2′, C-6′), 69.7 (CH3CH), 60.3 (CH3CH2O), 48.6 (CH2Ph), 19.3 (CH3CH), 15.9 (CH3C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 364 (M+, 1), 319 (1), 271 (26), 225 (5), 135 (4), 91 (100), 65 (11), 39 (5). C22H24N2O3 (364.18): calcd. C 72.50, H 6.64, N 7.69; found C 72.33, H 6.90, N 7.88.
Ethyl 3-benzyl-5-methyl-2-phenyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2o)
Imidazole 2o was isolated (method A: 96 mg, 50%; method B: 76 mg, 44%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.52 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 7.42–7.33 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.31–7.20 (m, 3H, H-3″–H-5″), 6.95 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, H-2″, H-6″), 5.58 (s, 2H, NCH2Ph), 4.22 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.61 (s, 3H, CH3C), 1.24 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.1 (C=O), 151.5 (C-2), 148.2 (C-5), 138.1 (C-1″), 134.0 (C-1′), 129.9 (C-4′), 129.4 (C-2′, C-6′), 128.82 (C-3′, C-5′), 128.78 (C-3″, C-5″), 127.4 (C-4″), 125.8 (C-2″, C-6″), 119.7 (C-4), 60.4 (CH3CH2O), 49.8 (NCH2), 16.0 (CH3C), 14.3 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 320 (M+, 12), 274 (3), 115 (4), 104 (6), 91 (100), 65 (8). C20H20N2O2 (320.15): calcd. C 74.98, H 6.29, N 8.74; found C 75.18, H 6.33, N 8.92.
Methyl 3-benzyl-5-ethyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2p)
Imidazole 2p was isolated (method A: 101 mg, 69%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50 to 40:60) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.53 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.39–7.23 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.20–7.08 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.46 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.90 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2C), 1.25 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2C) ppm. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.3 (C=O), 154.2 (C-5), 140.7 (C-2), 136.6 (C-1′), 128.8 (C-3′, C-5′), 127.9 (C-4′), 127.1 (C-2′, C-6′), 117.8 (C-4), 51.2 (CH2Ph), 50.6 (OCH3), 22.8 (CH3CH2C), 13.5 (CH3CH2C) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 244 (M+, 51), 229 (9), 197 (12), 153 (13), 121 (43), 91 (100), 65 (43). C14H16N2O2 (244,12) calcd. C 68.83, H 6.60, N 11.47; found C 69.06, H 6.68, N 11.58.
Methyl 3-allyl-5-ethyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2q)
Imidazole 2q was isolated (method A: 91 mg, 78%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50 to 40:60) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.48 (s, 1H, H-2), 5.96 (ddt, J = 17.0, 10.3, 5.5, 1H, NCH2CH), 5.18 (ddd, J = 10.3, 2.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H, Hcis), 5.04 (ddd, J = 17.0, 2.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H, Htrans), 4.85 (dt, J = 5.5, 1.3 Hz, 2H, NCH2), 3.84 (s, 3H, CH3O), 2.87 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2C), 1.22 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2C) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.3 (C=O), 154.0 (C-5), 140.3 (C-2), 133.3 (NCH2CH), 117.7 (NCHCH2), 117.6 (C-4), 51.2 (NCH2), 49.4 (OCH3), 22.7 (CH3CH2C), 13.6 (CH3CH2C) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 194 (M+, 64), 179 (82), 163 (20), 149 (11), 135 (22), 121 (100), 41 (33). C10H14N2O2 (194.11): calcd. C 61.84, H 7.27, N 14.42; found C 61.95, H 7.40, N 14.70.
Ethyl 3-benzyl-5-propyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2r)
Imidazole 2r was isolated (method B: 134 mg, 87%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50 to 40:60) as a colourless oil. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.50 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.37–7.20 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.16–7.04 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.44 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.24 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.86 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2CH2C), 1.70 (sext, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2CH2C), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O), 0.95 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2CH2C) ppm. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.9 (C=O), 152.8 (C-5), 140.6 (C-2), 136.7 (C-1′), 128.7 (C-3′, C-5′), 127.8 (C-4′), 127.0 (C-2′, C-6′), 118.4 (C-4), 60.2 (CH3CH2O), 50.5 (CH2Ph), 31.5 (CH3CH2CH2C), 22.8 (CH3CH2CH2C), 14.1 (CH3CH2O), 13.9 (CH3CH2CH2C) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 272 (M+, 4), 244 (22), 197 (6), 153 (5), 91 (100), 65 (6). C16H20N2O2 (272.15) calcd. C 70.56, H 7.40, N 10.29; found C 70.79, H 7.49, N 10.46.
Ethyl 3-Allyl-5-propyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2s)
Imidazole 2s was isolated (method B: 102 mg, 81%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50 to 40:60) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.46 (s, 1H, H-2), 5.96 (ddt, J = 17.0, 10.3, 5.5, 1H, NCH2CH), 5.17 (dd, J = 10.3, 1.1 Hz, 1H, Hcis), 5.02 (dd, J = 17.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H, Htrans), 4.85 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, NCH2), 4.29 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 2.83 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2CH2C), 1.67 (sext, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2CH2C), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O), 0.93 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2CH2C) ppm. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.9 (C=O), 152.5 (C-5), 140.1 (C-2), 133.4 (NCH2CH), 117.6 (2 x C: C-4, NCHCH2), 60.1 (CH3CH2O), 49.3 (NCH2), 31.4 (CH3CH2CH2C), 22.7 (CH3CH2CH2C), 14.2 (CH3CH2O), 13.9 (CH3CH2CH2C) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 222 (M+, 11), 207 (10), 194 (100), 177 (9), 165 (29), 149 (29), 135 (33) 125 (35) 109 (40) 41 (44). C12H18N2O2 (222.14): calcd. C 64.84, H 8.16, N 12.60; found C 65.02, H 8.37, N 12.67.
Methyl 3-benzyl-5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2t)
Imidazole 2t was isolated (method B: 97 mg, 59%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50 to 70:30) as a whitish solid, mp 68–71 °C. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.55 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.42–7.23 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 7.21–7.10 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.48 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 3.96 (s, 2H, CH2CO2CH3), 3.79 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.71 (s, 3H, CH3O) ppm. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 170.9 (CH2C=O), 160.6 (C=O), 144.5 (C-5), 140.8 (C-2), 136.1 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-3′, C-5′), 128.1 (C-4′), 127.3 (C-2′, C-6′), 119.8 (C-4), 52.0 (CH2Ph), 51.4 (OCH3), 50.7 (OCH3), 35.7 (CH2CO2CH3) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 288 (M+, 22), 228 (8), 197 (5), 121 (35), 91 (100), 65 (13). C15H16N2O4 (288.11) calcd. C 62.49, H 5.59, N 9.72; found C 62.80, H 5.40, N 9.96.
Methyl 3-allyl-5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2u)
Imidazole 2u was isolated (method B: 92 mg, 68%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50 to 40:60) as a colourless oil. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.55 (s, 1H, H-2), 6.00 (ddt, J = 17.0, 10.3, 5.6, 1H, NCH2CH), 5.24 (ddd, J = 10.3, 2.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H, Hcis), 5.11 (ddd, J = 17.0, 2.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H, Htrans), 3.96 (s, 2H, CH2CO2CH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.71 (s, 3H, CH3O) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 171.0 (CH2C=O), 160.6 (C=O), 144.3 (C-5), 140.4 (C-2), 132.9 (NCH2CH), 119.6 (C-4), 118.2 (NCHCH2), 52.1 (NCH2), 51.5 (OCH3), 49.6 (OCH3), 35.8 (CH2CO2CH3) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 238 (M+, 19), 206 (7), 179 (100), 147 (20), 119 (35), 41 (67). C11H14N2O4 (238.10): calcd. C 55.46, H 5.92, N 11.76; found C 55.87, H 5.68, N 12.09.
Methyl 3-benzyl-5-phenyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2v)
Imidazole 2v was isolated (method B: 99 mg, 57%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 50:50 to 40:60) as a whitish solid, mp 99–101 °C. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.75–7.60 (m, 2H, H-2″, H-6″), 7.66 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.48–7.27 (m, 6H, H-3′–H-5′, H-3″–H-5″), 7.22 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, H-2′, H-6′), 5.54 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.18 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 1.12 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.7 (C=O), 149.6 (C-5), 141.0 (C-2), 136.4 (C-1′), 134.3 (C-1″), 129.5 (C-2″, C-6″), 128.9 (2 x C), 128.09, 128.06, 127.6 (C-2′, C-6′), 127.2 (2 x C), 118.6 (C-4), 60.7 (CH3CH2O), 50.8 (CH2Ph), 13.8 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 306 (M+, 44), 260 (7), 233 (11), 171 (6), 91 (100), 65 (14). C19H18N2O2 (306.14) calcd. C 74.49, H 5.92, N 9.14; found C 74.77, H 5.77, N 9.33.
Methyl 3-allyl-5-phenyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylate (2w)
Imidazole 2w was isolated (method B: 90 mg, 62%) by column chromatography (light petroleum/ethyl acetate 70:30 to 40:60) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.78–7.59 (m, 3H, H-2′, H-6′, H-2), 7.50–7.30 (m, 3H, H-3′–H-5′), 6.06 (ddt, J = 17.0, 11.0, 5.5, 1H, NCH2CH), 5.28 (dd, J = 11.0, 0.9 Hz, 1H, Hcis), 5.17 (dd, J = 17.0, 0.9 Hz, 1H, Htrans), 4.95 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, NCH2), 4.24 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH3CH2O), 1.20 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3CH2O) ppm. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.7 (C=O), 149.4 (C-5), 140.5 (C-2), 134.4 (C-1′), 133.2 (NCH2CH), 129.5 (C-3′, C-5′), 128.0 (C-4′), 127.5 (C-2′, C-6′), 118.4 (C-4), 118.1 (CHCH2), 60.6 (CH3CH2O), 49.6 (CH2Ph), 13.8 (CH3CH2O) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 256 (M+, 100), 209 (43), 183 (86), 171 (27), 89 (43), 41 (44). C15H16N2O2 (256.12): calcd. C 70.29, H 6.29, N 10.93; found C 70.65, H 6.02, N 10.83.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Ministero dell’Università, dell’Istruzione e della Ricerca (PRIN 2007) and by the US National Institutes of Health (grant GM63815 to B.K. Shoichet and F.P.) is gratefully acknowledged. We are indebted to Prof. Livio Brasili (Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia) for kindly allowing use of the microwave reactor, and to Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Modena for refurbishing NMR and MS facilities.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.eurjoc.org/ or from the author.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this article): Experimental procedure for the preparation of non-commercially available aldehydes (and spectral data thereof) used for the synthesis of imidazole-4-carboxylates 2l–n and 1H and 13C NMR spectra for DDs 1c–f and imidazoles 2a–w.
References
- 1.For general reviews on microwave-assisted organic synthesis, see: Caddick S, Fitzmaurice R. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:3325–3355.Kappe CO, Dallinger D, Murphree SS, editors. Practical Microwave Synthesis for Organic Chemists: Strategies, Instruments, and Protocols. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2009. Loupy A, editor. Microwaves in Organic Synthesis. 2. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006. Bagley MC, Lubinu MC. Top Heterocycl Chem. 2006;1:31–58.Lidström P, Tierney JP, editors. Microwave-Assisted Organic Synthesis. Blackwell; Oxford: 2005. Lidström P, Tierney J, Wathey B, Westman J. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:9225–9283.Perreux L, Loupy A. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:9199–9223.
- 2.For reviews on the use of microwave heating in cycloadditions, see: Pineiro M, Pinho e Melo TMVD. Eur J Org Chem. 2009:5287–5307.Bougrin K, Soufiaoui M, Bashiardes G. In: Microwaves in Organic Synthesis. 2. Loupy A, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006. pp. 524–578.de la Hoz A, Díaz-Ortiz Á, Langa F. In: Microwaves in Organic Synthesis. Loupy A, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. pp. 295–343.
- 3.For selected examples, see: Arrieta A, Otaegui D, Zubia A, Cossío FP, Díaz-Ortiz Á, de la Hoz A, Herrero MA, Prieto P, Foces-Foces C, Pizarro JL, Arriortua MI. J Org Chem. 2007;72:4313–4322. doi: 10.1021/jo062672z.Bashiardes G, Safir I, Mohamed AS, Barbot F, Laduranty J. Org Lett. 2003;5:4915–4918. doi: 10.1021/ol0361195.Wilson NS, Sarko CR, Roth GP. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:8939–8941.
- 4.For reviews on the chemistry of DDs, see: Attanasi OA, De Crescentini L, Favi G, Filippone P, Mantellini F, Perrulli FR, Santeusanio S. Eur J Org Chem. 2009:3109–3127.Attanasi OA, De Crescentini L, Filippone P, Mantellini F, Santeusanio S. Arkivoc. 2002;xi:274–292.; for recent examples of DDs as versatile building blocks to a variety of heterocycles, see: Attanasi OA, Favi G, Giorgi G, Mantellini F, Karapetyan V, Langer P. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:5456–5461.Attanasi OA, De Crescentini L, Favi G, Filippone P, Giorgi G, Mantellini F, Moscatelli G, Behalo MS. Org Lett. 2009;11:2265–2268. doi: 10.1021/ol900545v.Attanasi OA, Berretta S, De Crescentini L, Favi G, Giorgi G, Mantellini F. Adv Synth Catal. 2009;351:715–719.Attanasi OA, Favi G, Filippone P, Perrulli FR, Santeusanio S. Org Lett. 2009;11:309–312. doi: 10.1021/ol802432z.
- 5.Attanasi OA, Davoli P, Favi G, Filippone P, Forni A, Moscatelli G, Prati F. Org Lett. 2007;9:3461–3464. doi: 10.1021/ol701522t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Attanasi OA, Caselli E, Davoli P, Favi G, Mantellini F, Ori C, Prati F. Org Lett. 2009;11:2840–2843. doi: 10.1021/ol901051z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Pinho e Melo TMVD. Eur J Org Chem. 2006:2873–2888. [Google Scholar]; b) Eberbach W. In: Science of Synthesis: Houben-Weyl Methods of Molecular Transformations. Padwa A, Bellus D, editors. Vol. 27. Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart: 2004. pp. 441–498. [Google Scholar]
- 8.For general reviews on azomethine ylides, see: Pandey G, Banerjee P, Gadre SR. Chem Rev. 2006;106:4484–4517. doi: 10.1021/cr050011g.Bonin M, Chauveau A, Micouin L. Synlett. 2006:2349–2363.Nájera C, Sansano JM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:6272–6276. doi: 10.1002/anie.200501074.Coldham I, Hufton R. Chem Rev. 2005;105:2765–2809. doi: 10.1021/cr040004c.Harwood LM, Vickers RJ. In: The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds: Synthetic Applications of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry toward Heterocycles and Natural Products. Padwa A, Pearson WH, editors. Vol. 59. Wiley and Sons; New York: 2002. pp. 169–252.Gothelf KV, Jørgensen KA. Chem Rev. 1998;98:863–909. doi: 10.1021/cr970324e.
- 9.a) Xia M, Lu Y-d. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 2007;265:205–208. [Google Scholar]; b) Kidwai M, Saxena S, Ruby, Rastogi S. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2005;26:2051–2053. [Google Scholar]; c) Gelens E, De Kanter FJJ, Schmitz RF, Sliedregt LAJM, Van Steen BJ, Kruse CG, Leurs R, Groen MB, Orru RVA. Mol Diversity. 2006;10:17–22. doi: 10.1007/s11030-006-8695-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zhao N, Wang YL, Wang JY. J Chin Chem Soc (Taipei, Taiwan) 2005;52:535–538. [Google Scholar]; e) Xu Y, Wan LF, Salehi H, Deng W, Guo QX. Heterocycles. 2004;63:1613–1618. [Google Scholar]; f) Sparks RB, Combs AP. Org Lett. 2004;6:2473–2475. doi: 10.1021/ol049124x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Wolkenberg SE, Wisnoski DD, Leister WH, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Lindsley CW. Org Lett. 2004;6:1453–1456. doi: 10.1021/ol049682b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Demirayak Ş, Mohsen UA, Güven K. Boll Chim Farm. 2002;141:443–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Ya A, Usyatinsky, Khmelnitsky Yu L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:5031–5034. [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Nagarapu L, Apuri S, Kantevari S. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 2007;266:104–108. [Google Scholar]; b) Xu Y, Liu Y-z, Rui L, Liu L, Guo Q-x. Heterocycles. 2004;63:87–93. [Google Scholar]
- 11.For reviews on the synthesis of imidazoles, see: Grimmett MR. In: Science of Synthesis. Neier R, editor. Vol. 12. Georg Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart: 2002. pp. 325–328.Ebel K. In: Methoden der Organischen Chemie (Houben-Weyl) Schaumann E, editor. E8c. Georg Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart: 1994. pp. 1–192.
- 12.a) Attanasi OA, Filippone P, Mei A, Serra-Zanetti F. Synth Commun. 1986;16:343–351. [Google Scholar]; b) Attanasi OA, Filippone P, Mei A, Santeusanio S. Synthesis. 1984:671–672. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu Q, Ferreira EM, Stoltz BM. J Org Chem. 2007;72:7352–7358. doi: 10.1021/jo0710883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

