Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e81894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081894

Figure 3. Grand-averaged difference waves (n=22) depicting multisensory processing during the congruent trials compared for the focused and distributed attention conditions.

Figure 3

a) Extracted processing for the visual constituent of multisensory stimulation (av-a) at occipital sites (O2 and PO7) showing significant visual P1 and N1 latency amplitude differences in younger adults, (b) no differences in older adults, (c) differences similar to younger adults in high, but not low performing older adults, and (d) source estimates of the P1 and N1 latency modulations. (e-h) Parallel effects obtained for processing of the auditory constituent of multisensory stimulation (av-v) showing attention related differences at P2 latencies.