Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e81894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081894

Figure 4. Grand-averaged difference waves (n=22) depicting multisensory processing during the incongruent trials compared for the focused and distributed attention conditions.

Figure 4

a) Extracted processing for the visual constituent of multisensory stimulation (av-a) at occipital site (O2) showing significant visual P1 latency amplitude differences in younger adults, (b) no differences in older adults, (c) differences similar to younger adults in high, but not low performing older adults, and (d) source estimates of the P1 latency modulation. (e-h) Parallel effects obtained for processing of the auditory constituent of multisensory stimulation (av-v) showing attention related differences at P2 latencies.