Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 30;22(24):5075–5082. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt357

Table 2.

The original GWAS tagSNP and the most associated variant after imputation with 1000 genomes and CG panel together with pair wise LD metrics (r2, D′)

tagSNP
top SNP
R2 D
SNP Position OR P-value MAF SNP Position OR P-value MAF
1q41 rs6691170 222 045 446 1.08 2.39E−03 0.397 rs11118883 222 061 022 1.12 1.18E−04 0.348 0.393 0.719
3q26 rs10936599 169 492 101 1.12 2.20E−04 0.253 Indel 169 583 245 1.10 9.79E−05 0.250 0.906a 1.000a
6p21 rs1321311 36 622 900 1.08 4.88E−03 0.205 rs9918353 36 622 677 1.08 3.13E−03 0.205 0.985 0.995
8q23 rs16892766 117 630 683 1.24 7.84E−07 0.092 rs140355816 117 574 515 1.61 2.58E−09 0.017 0.092 0.724
8q24 rs6983267 128 413 305 1.20 1.64E−12 0.480 rs7013278 128 414 892 1.20 1.63E−12 0.343 0.444 1.000
10p14 rs10795668 8 701 219 1.17 3.97E−09 0.327 rs11255841 8 739 580 1.19 7.73E−11 0.321 0.850 0.931
11q13 rs3824999 74 345 550 1.16 2.57E−09 0.471 rs11604752 74 277 144 1.16 7.29E−10 0.476 0.919 0.973
11q23 rs3802842 111 171 709 1.15 4.48E−06 0.269 rs11213801 111 119 694 1.15 1.88E−07 0.276 0.317 0.794
12q13 rs11169552 51 155 663 1.12 9.05E−05 0.247 rs61928263 50 588 659 1.17 4.42E−08 0.223 0.022 0.775
14q22 rs4444235 54 410 919 1.10 3.34E−04 0.483 1.000 1.000
15q13 rs4779584 32 994 756 1.21 7.28E−09 0.191 rs1406389 33 009 478 1.24 7.57E−12 0.222 0.269 0.652
16q22 rs9929218 68 820 946 1.09 5.75E−04 0.286 rs146639854 68 429 091 1.36 8.30E−05 0.020 0.009 1.000
18q21 rs4939827 46 453 463 1.24 7.29E−16 0.471 Indel 46 451 805 1.25 2.08E−17 0.421 0.568a 0.963a
19q13 rs10411210 33 532 300 1.25 2.11E−06 0.096 rs79812655 33 517 923 1.23 1.27E−07 0.131 0.419 0.717
20p12 rs961253 6 404 281 1.10 2.66E−04 0.367 rs990999 6 692 529 1.13 6.49E−06 0.377 0.001 0.028
20q13 rs4925386 60 921 044 1.16 8.31E−07 0.318 rs2236202 60 985 164 1.22 2.02E−11 0.249 0.214 0.591

aFor indels, the next most associated SNP was used to derive LD statistics.