Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 21;9(11):e1003363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003363

Table 2. Dissociation constants, melting temperatures, average reversible coupled binding and folding transition rates calculated using various coarse-grained models with and without explicit charges and/or 0.05 M salt.

Models Calc. K D T m (K) k TS (µs−1) k cap (ns−1) k esc (ns−1) k evo (ns−1)
TAD1/TAZ2
No charge 1.4±2.0 µM 327 4.3±1.5 1.4 8.0 0.049
Charged, 0.05M salt 1.6±1.6 µM 340 14.5±1.1 3.2 4.1 0.08
Explicit charges 4.9±3.2 µM 335 27.0±0.2 32.1 0.10 0.16
HIF-1α/TAZ1
No charge 64±64 nM 327 6.1±0.5 2.8 6.3 0.022
Charged, 0.05M salt 9.4±9.6 nM 340 10.2±1.8 3.4 5.6 0.039
Explicit charges 1.3±1.6 nM 345 29.4±3.7 5.0 0.69 0.048
NCBD/ACTR
No charge 67±99 nM 318 0.53±0.2 0.13 0.61 0.0043
Charged, 0.05M salt 96±92 nM 315 1.7±0.1 0.29 0.31 0.0074
Explicit charges 39±14 nM 322 5.2±0.7 0.79 0.020 0.012

K D was calculated from REX simulations at 300 K(see Table 1 for the experimental values); k TS was calculated from the production Langevin simulations at the corresponding T m, as k TS = N TS/t tot, where N TS is the number of reversible binding and folding transitions observed during the total simulation time span t tot. As all simulations were performed at T m, k TS as defined is half of the binding and unbinding rates. k cap k esc and k evo are defined in Eqns. 14. The effective concentrations of these simulations are 1.66 mM, 1.66 mM and 1.43 mM for p53-TAD1/TAZ2, HIF-1α/TAZ1 and NCBD/ACTR, respectively. All uncertainties were estimated as the differences between results calculated from the first and second halves of the data.