Low reported coverage |
Drugs are not reaching targeted population.
|
1. Who are drug distributors—are they appropriate for the community? |
|
|
2. Check motivation of drug distributors in terms of incentives, training, logistical capacity. |
|
|
3. Assess security situation and time of MDA. |
|
|
4. Is the distribution method appropriate? |
|
|
5. Check reporting forms and systems. |
High reported coverage with low drug coverage (e.g., compliance with treatment) |
Drugs distributed to targeted population are not being swallowed.
|
1. Consider how DO-MDA can be implemented (time of day for MDA, distribution method). |
|
|
2. Assess level of awareness about MDA in the community; should novel communications be introduced (cell phones, social media)? |
|
|
3. Are local leaders and groups involved in the process? |
|
|
4. Assess fear and management of adverse events. |
|
|
5. Evaluate role and reputation of health services in the population. |
High rates of systematic non-compliance |
Individuals have not ingested the drugs in any MDA round.
|
1. Identify subgroups with high non-compliance rates and design programs to target these groups. |
|
|
2. Consider a test-and-treat approach. |
|
|
3. Use of behavior change models to address persistent non-compliance (e.g., motivational interviewing). |
Local health system (at IU level) weak and unable to conduct MDA |
Local health system weakened due to lack of personnel, funds, or post-conflict situation.
|
1. Identify local NGOs or organizations who would be capable of conducting MDA in a specific IU. |
|
|
2. Where logistics are challenged, identify possible private sector participants to fill the gap. |
Reported coverage decreasing as MDA rounds continue |
Drugs are not reaching the population as MDA continues.
|
1. Consider health service personnel and drug distributor fatigue and how to address it. |
|
|
2. Has there been a change in local management? |
|
|
3. Has there been a change in logistical provision? |
Drug coverage decreasing as MDA rounds continue |
Individuals who may have taken drugs in previous rounds are refusing to comply with treatment.
|
1. Has there been a population increase to affect the denominator? |
|
|
2. Are there persistent rumors affecting the campaign? |
|
|
3. Are adverse events being adequately managed? |
|
|
4. Assess drug distributors' ability to respond to questions, fears. |
High reported coverage and low surveyed coverage |
Drug distributors report distributing adequate number of drugs to the targeted population, but independent coverage surveys report lower rates of drug coverage or compliance.
|
1. Check reporting forms and systems. |
|
|
2. Review possible population shifts. |
|
|
3. Consider how DO-MDA can be implemented (time of day for MDA, method of distribution). |
|
|
4. Assess security situation and timing of MDA. |
|
|
5. Is the distribution method appropriate? |