Table 1. Studies comparing open door with French door cervical laminoplasty: characteristics of included studies.
Investigator Study design CoE |
Demographicsa | Diagnosis | Open door laminoplastyb | French door laminoplasty | Follow-up (% followed up) |
Reported outcomes | Post-op care (collar, orthosis, mobilization) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Okada et al6
RCT CoE: II |
|
|
|
|
26.9 months (87.5) |
|
NR |
Yue et al7
Retrospective cohort CoE: III |
|
|
|
|
32.1 mo (12–60) (86) |
|
NR |
Naito et al8
Retrospective cohort CoE: III |
|
|
|
|
60.1 months (29–88) (97) |
|
Bed rest for 1 wk, then patient allowed to stand and walk wearing Philadelphia color or Somi brace for 12–16 weeks |
Abbreviations: CDH, cervical disc herniation; CoE, class of evidence; CSM, cervical spondylotic myelopathy; JOA, Japanese Orthopedic Association score; NR, not reported; OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Demographics reflect the number of patients after loss to follow-up (n = 35)6 and (n = 37),7 or included in analysis (n = 83).8
Study also included a third intervention group, Z-plasty (n = 35).8