Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;4(2):105–115. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357361

Table 3. Studies comparing open door with French door cervical laminoplasty: postoperative complication rates.

Open door, % French door, %
Reoperation (causes)a
Okada et al6 6 (1/17)
Cause: spinal canal restenosis (n = 1)
0 (0/18)
Yue et al7 NR 4 (1/25)
Cause: dural tear
C7 radiculopathy
Okada et al6 12 (2/17) NR
Shoulder numbness/pain
Okada et al6 12 (2/17) NR
C5 palsy (transient)
Okada et al6 6 (1/17) NR
Hemiparesis (transient)
Okada et al6 6 (1/17) NR
Wound infection (superficial)
Okada et al6 6 (1/17) NR
CSF leakage/dural tear (intraoperative)
Okada et al6 NR 6 (1/18)
Yue et al7 NR 4 (1/25)
Naito et al8 3 (1/35) NR
Bleeding
Okada et al6 12 (2/17) NR
Yue et al7 b 8 (1/12) NR
Misrecognition of surgical level
Okada et al6 NR 6 (1/18)
Restenosis
Okada et al6 6 (1/17) 0 (0/18)
Right facet fracture (C7/Th1)
Okada et al6 6 (1/17) NR

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; NR: not reported.

a

Study reports additional surgery on four patients: preplanned anterior spinal fusion (n = 2), and anterior spinal fusion from numbness (n = 1) or C5 radiculopathy (n = 1); treatment group NR7; study reports reoperation (anterior cervical fusion) for two patients, but it is unclear which type of cervical laminoplasty these patients received.8

b

Study reports complications, including superficial wound infections or blood loss of > 500 mL, in 10 patients; details, including treatment group, NR.7