Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 21;8(11):e79967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079967

Table 3. Results of the ecological (EM) and the complete models (CM), and of the hierarchical partitioning applied to tawny owl roadkill data (Regression models – Coefficient: model coefficients of the explanatory variables, S.E.: standard errors, t-value: t test, p-value significance of the t test for the ecological and complete models; Hierarchical partitioning – I: independent contribution, J: joint contribution, Total: total contribution, I(%): percent independent contributions of individual variables for the explained variance of roadkill data, Z-score: statistical significance of independent contribution of variables, *p<0.05; see Table 1 for variable codes.

Regression models Hierarchical partitioning
Variables Coefficient S.E. t value p-value I J Total I (%) Z-score
EM Intercept −1.457 0.838 −1.739 0.086
ROAD 3.129 0.727 4.301 <0.001 0.219 0.037 0.256 70.459 11.59*
HABITAT −0.836 0.927 −0.902 0.370 0.010 0.001 0.011 3.306 −0.180
HQ5 0.659 0.292 2.257 0.027 0.081 0.030 0.112 26.235 3.65*
Total 0.310
CM Intercept −0.326 0.672 −0.486 0.629
ROAD 1.787 0.598 2.988 0.004 0.144 0.112 0.256 24.521 7.81*
HABITAT 0.369 0.742 0.498 0.620 0.010 0.001 0.011 1.668 −0.180
HQ5 0.310 0.233 1.332 0.187 0.057 0.055 0.112 9.614 2.38*
SPA 0.958 0.139 6.887 <0.001 0.378 0.109 0.487 64.196 22.12*
Total 0.589

(ecological model: AICc = 203.3, r = 0.557; complete model: AICc = 166.8, r = 0.767).