Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;57(12):6236–6245. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01578-13

Table 5.

Relative in vitro replication capacity of NS3 variants

Variant Telaprevir replicon EC50 fold changea Level of resistance to telaprevirb Replication capacity ± SD (%)c
WT 1 None 100 ± 7
V36I 0.3 146 ± 18
V36A 7.4 Lower 104 ± 26
V36C 7.8 98 ± 9
V36G 11 59 ± 8
V36M 7.0 77 ± 12
T54A 6.3 65 ± 10
T54S 4.2 59 ± 3
R155G 7.4 10 ± 3
R155I 24 20 ± 7
R155K 7.4 80 ± 16
R155M 5.6 18 ± 2
R155S 4.1 45 ± 8
R155T 20 39 ± 7
A156S 9.6 88 ± 8
V36A + T54A 20 8 ± 2
A156N >93 Higher 9 ± 4
A156T >62 16 ± 2
A156V >62 9 ± 2
V36A + R155K ∼41 57 ± 4
V36A + R155T >62 23 ± 11
V36M + R155K ∼64 42 ± 6
V36M + R155T >62 36 ± 8
V36M + A156T >62 9 ± 5
a

The fold change of the mean EC50 of the variant replicon compared with that of the WT replicon was determined in G1b 48-h or 96-h assays as presented in Table 1. “>” and “∼” are as described in Table 1.

b

Lower-level resistance, EC50 change from 3- to 25-fold; higher-level resistance, EC50 change > 25-fold. V36I did not confer resistance to telaprevir (EC50 change < 3-fold).

c

The mean replication capacity and SD were derived from 31 and 3 to 7 individual experiments for the WT and variant replicons, respectively. Data for V36I, T54S, A156N, and A156S were generated with a pFK I341PiLuc/NS3-3′/ET replicon in Huh-7-ET-cured cells; the rest of the data were generated with a pBR322-Luc-mADE replicon in Huh-7.5 cells.