Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;51(12):3988–3992. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01889-13

Table 1.

BC-GP assay and conventional identification of bacterial isolates in 148 blood cultures

BC-GP assay target No. of isolates detected by:
% agreement
BC-GP assaya Conventional identificationb
Staphylococcus spp.c 78 81 96
S. aureus 36 38 95
S. epidermidis 25 26 96
Enterococcus faecalis 2 3 67
Enterococcus faecium 15 16 94
Streptococcus spp.d 29 30 97
S. agalactiae 9 9 100
S. anginosus group 1 1 100
S. pneumoniae 6 6 100
Nontarget organismse 26 26 100
Overall target agreementf 96
a

Includes isolates that were positive on repeat testing after failures in initial testing.

b

Samples with more than one organism corresponding to the same target were counted once per target. Reasons for discrepancies in the numbers between the BC-GP assay results and conventional identification included polymicrobial samples, one repeat test failure, and one failure of the BC-GP assay to detect the target.

c

BC-GP assay target includes S. aureus and S. epidermidis.

d

BC-GP assay target includes S. agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and S. anginosus group.

e

Blood sample organisms that were not intended targets of the BC-GP assay included Aerococcus viridans (n = 2), Bacillus spp. (n = 6), Corynebacterium spp. (n = 8), Escherichia coli (n = 2), Lactobacillus spp. (n = 2), Micrococcus spp. (n = 2), Neisseria spp. (n = 1), Propionibacterium spp. (n = 1), Rothia spp. (n = 1), and C. tropicalis (n = 1).

f

Overall target agreement is the percentage of targets which correlated with organism identification. Resistance markers were not included in this calculation.