Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;87(24):13785–13794. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02436-13

Table 1.

IC50s and IC90s obtained with different in vitro assays

Assay IC50a/IC90b (nM)
P value for MV HRC2 vs MV HRC4
MV HRC1 MV HRC2 MV HRC3 MV HRC4
Plaque reduction 6,941/>10,000 2.03/26.6 285/2,837 <1/2.7 0.0016
Spreading ∼2,132 56.91 ∼2,286 56.71
Fusion at 2 h 58.44 <1 68.57 <1
Fusion at 4 h 1,992 15.57 381.5 <1
Fusion at 6 h 2,088/>10,000 580/2,259 2,305/2,768 1.05/3.2 <0.0001
Ex vivo culture ND 9.38 ND 10.07
a

The IC50s of MV HRC1, HRC2, HRC3, and HRC4 were determined by entry, spreading, fusion, and ex vivo assays.

b

The IC90 was calculated when the IC50 could not be determined. Statistical comparisons of MV HRC2 and HRC4 fits were performed with the F test.