Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Sep 16;64:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.021. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.021

Table 4.

Associations Between Age and White Matter Tracts

FA: p-values r RD: p-values r AD: p-values r
Working Memory Tracts left right left right left right left right left right left right
 CC Genu 0.006 .36 0.004 −.36 0.306
 Ant. Cingulum 0.052 0.116 0.018 0.043 −.31 0.674 0.450
 Ant. Thalamic Radiation 0.018 0.011 .28 .30 0.003 0.005 −.34 −.34 0.237 0.528
 Sup. Thalamic Radiation 0.069 0.073 0.032 0.006 −.34 0.554 0.134
 Arcuate Fasciculus 0.121 0.042 0.051 0.026 0.560 0.733
 Temporal-Parietal Seg. 0.299 0.165 0.009 0.034 −.31 0.206 0.632
Control Tracts
 CC Splenium 0.286 0.152 0.513
 CC Body 0.092 0.140 0.777
 Inf. Long. Fasciculus 0.128 0.425 0.511 0.958 0.171 0.639
 Spinothalamic Radiation 0.144 0.066 0.083 0.013 −.35 0.475 0.147
 Optic Nerve 0.163 0.708 0.664 0.191 0.954 0.253

A mixed linear regression model was used to analyze diffusion indices (FA, RD, AD) in each fiber tract, including all tracts as dependent variables, with gender, age, non-verbal developmental quotient, verbal developmental quotient, and working memory performance as predictor variables. Table shows uncorrected p-values, bolded values show significant associations between white matter and infants’ age (adjusted for gestational length), after correcting for multiple comparisons. Partial correlations provide a measure of effect size for significant associations.