Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 22;8(11):e81031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081031

Figure 6. The effects of manipulating Ca2+ and GABA signaling in the culture medium.

Figure 6

Bar graphs comparing the proportion of cells firing sAPs (A) and mean Vm (B) following 3 weeks of differentiation in ACM alone, or ACM with 10µM bicuculline (a GABAA antagonist), with 2 µM nifedipine (an L-type Ca2+ channel antagonist), with 100 nM conotoxin (a N-type Ca2+ channel toxin) or with 100 nM SNX482 (an R- type Ca2+ channel toxin). Chi2 tests were performed comparing the ACM with each toxin against ACM alone. ±P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, nsnot significant, n = 57.

Bar graphs comparing the proportion of cells firing sAPs (C) and mean Vm (D) following 1 and 2 weeks of differentiation in control medium (0.6 mM Ca2+), high Ca2+ medium (1.8mM Ca2+), control medium with 300µM GABA and, high Ca2+ medium with 10µM bicuculline). T-tests were performed comparing the GABA and high Ca2+ media with control medium and the bicuculline medium with high Ca2+ medium for each week. ±P < 0.05, ***P < 0.0001, nsnot significant, n = 133.