Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 22;8(11):e79380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079380

Table 4. Comparison of methods for subgroup detection with respect to AUC values, for group size Inline graphic and subgroup size Inline graphic, Inline graphic, corresponding to Figure 1.

Criterion AUC(LR)≥0.95 AUC(Method) = 0.95
Scenario I II III I II III
LR (optimum) 0.96 0.95 0.96 2.0 3.63 2.93
FisherSum 0.89 0.87 0.72 2.6 5.28 >6
ORT 0.79 0.77 0.68
OS 0.70 0.72 0.66
t-test 0.79 0.77 0.49 4.2 9.24
PADGE 0.75 0.74 0.55 6.6 >10
Kurtosis 0.60 0.62 0.66 4.6 >10 >15
Bartlett 0.70 0.72 0.80 3.2 6.60 5.33

Left three columns contain AUC values when tests are compared at Inline graphic value with AUCInline graphic for LR. Right three columns correspond to Inline graphic values with AUCInline graphic for each test. Best values plotted in bold per simulation scenario.